最近更新：2024-12-25
2023-cv-05040
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 06/06/2024 | FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order 38 in the amount of the Judgment Amount as to certain defendant |
| 03/29/2024 | NOTICE of withdrawal of surety bond 25 by John Summerfield. (Received at the Intake Counter on 03/29/2024) |
| 03/28/2024 | FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order 38 in the amount of the Judgment Amount as to certain defendant |
| 01/11/2024 | FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order 38 in the amount of the judgment amount as to certain defendant |
| 12/26/2023 | FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER. Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 12/26/2023. Mailed notice. |
| 12/26/2023 | ORDER: No Defendant has responded to Plaintiff's motion (Dkt. 34) for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion is granted. Because Defendants directly targettheir business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants. Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass'n v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 934 (N.D. Ill. 2016). Plaintiff has presented screenshot evidence that each DefendantInternet Store is reaching out to do business with Illinois residents by operating one or more commercial, interactive Internet Stores through which Illinois residents can and do purchase infringing products. See, e.g., Dkt. 14, 15. In addition, based on the evidence previously submitted by Plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, Plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction is warranted. The infringement of Plaintiff's patents irreparably harms Plaintiff and confuses thepublic. Based on the foregoing, the Court awards Plaintiff the damages amounts set forth in the separate final judgment order based upon an accounting of the profitsmade by each Defaulting Defendant, which amounts are, again, not contested by any Defaulting Defendant. Enter separate Final Judgment Order. Plaintiff's pending motion (Dkt. 28) seeking a preliminary injunction is dismissed as moot. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 12/26/2023. Mailed notice. |
| 12/15/2023 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 35 附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
| 12/15/2023 | MEMORANDUM by GS Holistic, LLC in support of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment 34 附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
| 12/15/2023 | MOTION by Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC for entry of default, MOTION by Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC for default judgment as to all Defendants 附件： 1:(Exhibit A) |
| 11/21/2023 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by GS Holistic, LLC as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 11/21/2023, answer due 12/12/2023. 附件： 1:Declaration of Quinn B. Guillermo 2:(Exhibit A) |
| 11/16/2023 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC regarding order on motion for preliminary injunction, terminate deadlines and hearings, terminate motion and R&R deadlines/hearings, set motion and R&R deadlines/hearings, 31 附件： 1:(Exhibit A) |
| 11/16/2023 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion 28 for entry of a preliminary injunction as to certain Defendants. In connection with that motion, which is entered and continued, Plaintiff must forthwith serve the affected Defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no affected Defendant appears and objects on or before 11/21/2023." Plaintiff must promptly file proof of service of the Court's statement. For the reasons stated in the Court's orders entering and extending the temporary restraining order ("TRO"), the TRO is further extended to and including the date on which the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice |
| 11/14/2023 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by GS Holistic, LLC as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 11/14/2023, answer due 12/5/2023. 附件： 1:Declaration of Quinn B. Guillermo 2:Exhibit A |
| 11/14/2023 | MEMORANDUM by GS Holistic, LLC in support of motion for preliminary injunction[28] 附件： 1:Declaration of Justin T. Joseph 2:Exhibit 1 |
| 11/14/2023 | MOTION by Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC for preliminary injunction as to Certain Defendants 附件： 1:Exhibit A |
| 11/06/2023 | EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 11/6/2023. Mailed notice |
| 11/06/2023 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's Motion for extension of Temporary Restraining Order 23 is granted. Enter separate order. Mailed notice |
| 10/26/2023 | SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000.00 posted by GS Holistic, LLC (Document not scanned). |
| 10/31/2023 | MEMORANDUM by GS Holistic, LLC in support of extension of time[23] 附件： 1:Declaration of Justin T. Joseph |
| 10/31/2023 | MOTION by Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC for extension of time of Temporary Restraining Order |
| 10/23/2023 | SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 10/20/2023 | SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 10/20/2023 |
| 10/20/2023 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 4, ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order 12, and motion for electronic service of process 17 are granted in part. Plaintiff's submissions (e.g., Dkt. 15) establish that, were Defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of Plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that Defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, Plaintiff may for now file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal and appearing at docket entries 2, 3, and 16. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall also be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis under FRCP 65(b)(1). Specifically, and as noted above, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating Plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping Defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an equitable accounting. In addition, the Court finds, at least for now on this limited and one-sided record and without prejudice to revisiting the issue, that it has personal jurisdiction over the Defendants because they directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois. Specifically, Defendants have targeted sales to Illinois residents by setting up and operating e-commerce stores that target United States consumers using one or more Seller Aliases, offer shipping to the United States, including Illinois, accept payment in U.S. dollars, and have sold products using infringing and counterfeit versions of Plaintiff's trademarks to residents of Illinois. The evidence presented to the Court also shows that Plaintiff has demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit goods, and there is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to Defendants. As this Court and others have noted, there may be reason to question both the propriety of the joinder of all Defendants in this one action, but at this preliminary stage, the court is persuaded that Plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity to justify the requested relief as to all Defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any defendant appears and objects, the Court will reconsider the asset freeze and joinder. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Mailed notice |
| 09/27/2023 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC by Quinn Bradley Guillermo |
| 08/03/2023 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 18 附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:(Exhibit 2) |
| 08/03/2023 | MEMORANDUM by GS Holistic, LLC in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 17 |
| 08/03/2023 | MOTION by Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLCfor Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) |
| 08/03/2023 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC Exhibit 2 - Parts 1-2 regarding declaration 15 附件： 1:Exhibit 2-1 2:(Exhibit 2-2) |
| 08/03/2023 | DECLARATION of Christopher Folkerts regarding memorandum in support of motion 13 附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
| 08/03/2023 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 13 附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:(Exhibit 2) |
| 08/03/2023 | MEMORANDUM by GS Holistic, LLC in support of motion for temporary restraining order 12 |
| 08/03/2023 | MOTION by Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery |
| 08/01/2023 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 08/01/2023 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. |
| 08/01/2023 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC by Trevor Christian Talhami |
| 08/01/2023 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC by Justin Tyler Joseph |
| 08/01/2023 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC by Amy Crout Ziegler |
| 08/01/2023 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC by Justin R. Gaudio |
| 08/01/2023 | Notice of Claims Involving Patents by GS Holistic, LLC |
| 08/01/2023 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by GS Holistic, LLC |
| 08/01/2023 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 08/01/2023 | MOTION by Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC for leave to file under Seal |
| 08/01/2023 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC Schedule A regarding complaint[1] |
| 08/01/2023 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC Exhibit 1 - Parts 1-2 regarding complaint[1] |
| 08/01/2023 | COMPLAINT filed by GS Holistic, LLC; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20886384. 附件： 1:Exhibit 2 2:Exhibit 3 3:Exhibit 4 4:Exhibit 5 |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
