最近更新：2024-12-25
2020-cv-01666
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 05/19/2020 | MAILED Patent/Trademark report with certified copy of minute order 35 dated 5/18/20 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA. |
| 05/18/2020 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Pursuant to the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Dckt. No. 34) and under Rule 41(a)(1), all remaining Defendants identified in Schedule A are dismissed without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs. All pending deadlines and hearings are stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 05/18/2020 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Art Ask Agency Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of All Remaining Defendants |
| 04/24/2020 | ORDER Third Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on April 24, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Third Amended General Order. Parties are must carefully review all obligations under this Order, including the requirement listed in paragraph number 5 to file a joint written status report in most civil cases. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 4/24/2020: Mailed notice. (docket9,) |
| 03/30/2020 | ORDER Seconded Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 30, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Second Amended General Order. Amended General Order 20-0012, entered on March 17, 2020, and General Order 20-0014, entered on March 20, 2020, are vacated and superseded by this Second Amended General. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/30/2020: Mailed notice. (docket1,) |
| 03/18/2020 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order (Dckt. No. 11) is denied without prejudice. Injunctive relief is an "extraordinary remedy," and it is "not granted routinely." 11A Charles Alan Wright & Arthur Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2942 (3d ed. 2019). "Perhaps the most significant single component in the judicial decision whether to exercise equity jurisdiction and grant permanent injunctive relief is the court's discretion." Id. It is a fact-specific inquiry, and "depends on the circumstances of each case." Id. Here, Plaintiff makes next to no showing that it will suffer irreparable harm unless this Court issues emergency relief. The gist of the motion is that Plaintiff will suffer harm from the sale (and the offer for sale) of counterfeit unicorn products on the internet. But Plaintiff gives this Court no information about the anticipated loss of sales. Not even an estimate. Plaintiff doesn't even tell this Court anything about its own sales, let alone anything about the volume of sales that it will lose without immediate Court action. Maybe the loss of sales is de minimis, or maybe not. But the point is that Plaintiff has made no such showing. A generic allegation of harm, without more, does not weigh heavily in the balance. On the flipside, one of the most important considerations before awarding equitable relief is the public interest. Here, Plaintiff proposes a bloated order that imposes extraordinary demands on third parties, including a wide array of technology companies and financial institutions. (Dckt. No. 30) Plaintiff's proposed order would require immediate action, in a matter of days, from firms that have nothing to do with this case. In the meantime, the country is in the midst of a crisis from the coronavirus, and it is not a good time to put significant demands on innocent third parties. See generally General Order 20-0012 (as amended on March 17, 2020). All of them undoubtedly have (more) pressing matters on their plates right now. To put it bluntly, Plaintiff's proposed order seems insensitive to others in the current environment. Simply put, trademark infringement is an important consideration, but so is the strain that the rest of country is facing, too. It is important to keep in perspective the costs and benefits of forcing everyone to drop what they're doing to stop the sale of knock-off unicorn products, in the midst of a pandemic. Without a showing of immediate, real-world harm, this Court cannot impose significant demands on third parties in the current environment. That said, this Court denies the motion without prejudice. Later, perhaps Plaintiff will make a better showing. But for now, Plaintiff has come up short (by a wide margin). As a reminder, the Court expects Plaintiff and its counsel to follow General Order 20-0012, including the admonition about emergency motions. Mailed notice. |
| 03/18/2020 | E-MAIL CORRESPONDENCE dated March 12, 2020 by Art Ask Agency. 附件： 1:Text of Proposed Sealed Temporary Restraining Order |
| 03/18/2020 | ORDER In light of the public health situation, the Court encourages all parties and their counsel to take precautions, be reasonable, and use common sense in pending cases. In General Order No. 20-0012 dated March 16, 2020 (and amended on March 17), the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois extended all deadlines in civil cases by three weeks. Parties should assume that this Court will accommodate reasonable requests for extensions in the coming weeks, and counsel should show flexibility and accommodate each other too. This Court will grant a six-week extension of fact discovery if requested (and there is no need for an immediate request). Parties should not take depositions before April 17 unless (1) they take place telephonically; and (2) all parties and the witness(es) consent. Even a telephonic deposition often requires an in-person meeting to prepare the witness, so telephonic depositions can go forward only if everyone agrees. If any party or witness wants a deposition to take place in person, the deposition will take place after April 17. Needless to say, that date may change as the public health situation continues to evolve. Parties should continue to make progress in their cases when possible, but in a manner that is consistent with public health and safety. In the meantime, continue to work together cooperatively in the best traditions of our shared profession. The Court thanks all parties and their counsel for their patience and understanding during this difficult time.Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 3/18/2020: Mailed notice. (docket1,) |
| 03/18/2020 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's Emergency Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Transfer of the Defendant Domain Names, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication (Dckt. No. 23) is hereby denied. Order to follow. Motion hearing set for March 20, 2020 is vacated. Mailed notice. |
| 03/18/2020 | ORDER Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 3/18/2020. Mailed notice. |
| 03/18/2020 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's Motion to Re-Set Hearing Date of April 13, 2020 for Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Dckt. No. 20) is denied. Order to follow. Motion hearing set for March 19, 2020 is vacated. Mailed notice. |
| 03/18/2020 | NOTICE of Motion by Michael A. Hierl for presentment of motion for temporary restraining order, 23 before Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 3/20/2020 at 09:00 AM. |
| 03/18/2020 | MEMORANDUM by Art Ask Agency in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 23 Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Emergency Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Transfer of the Defendant Domain Names, A Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by E-Mail and/or Electronic Publication |
| 03/18/2020 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Emergency Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Transfer of the Defendant Domain Names, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication |
| 03/16/2020 | ORDER Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 16, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Amended General Order. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/16/2020: Mailed notice. |
| 03/16/2020 | NOTICE of Motion by Michael A. Hierl for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief 20 before Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 3/19/2020 at 09:00 AM. |
| 03/16/2020 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask AgencyReset hearing Plaintiff's Motion to Re-Set Hearing Date of April 13, 2020 for Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order |
| 03/13/2020 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Motion hearing set for March 17, 2020 is stricken and reset for April 13, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. Mailed notice. |
| 03/10/2020 | NOTICE of Motion by Michael A. Hierl for presentment of motion for temporary restraining order, 11, motion for leave to file 6 before Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 3/17/2020 at 09:00 AM. |
| 03/10/2020 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 5 of Strid Declaration |
| 03/10/2020 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 4 of Strid Declaration |
| 03/10/2020 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 3 of Strid Declaration |
| 03/10/2020 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 2 of Strid Declaration |
| 03/10/2020 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 1 of Strid Declaration |
| 03/10/2020 | MEMORANDUM by Art Ask Agency in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 11 附件： 1:Declaration Declaration of Maria Strid 2:Exhibit Exhibit 1 3:Declaration Declaration of Michael A. Hierl 4:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 1 5:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 2 6:Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 3 |
| 03/10/2020 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Transfer of the Defendant Domain Names, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication |
| 03/10/2020 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
| 03/10/2020 | MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 03/10/2020 | NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. |
| 03/09/2020 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. |
| 03/09/2020 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Sealed Schedule A |
| 03/09/2020 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency for leave to file Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal |
| 03/09/2020 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Art Ask Agency Plaintiff's Corporate Disclosure Statement and Notification as to Affiliates Pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 7.1 and Local Rule 3.2 |
| 03/09/2020 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Art Ask Agency by William Benjamin Kalbac |
| 03/09/2020 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Art Ask Agency by Michael A. Hierl |
| 03/09/2020 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 03/09/2020 | COMPLAINT filed by Art Ask Agency; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16807253. 附件： 1:Exhibit Group Exhibit 1 |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
