2024-cv-03641
日期 | 描述 |
---|---|
05/10/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) and the Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal 10, this action is being dismissed without prejudice against all defendants. All pending motions and deadlines are terminated as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice |
05/09/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by RV, LLC of Certain Doe Defendants |
05/07/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's motion for leave to temporarily seal documents and temporarily proceed pseudonymously 7 is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's submissions establish that, were Defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of a temporary restraining order, there is a significant risk that Defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Conversely, there are no exceptional circumstances that would justify allowing Plaintiff to conceal its own identity: Plaintiff anticipates filing an ex parte TRO motion, and the identity of the defendant entities will be placed under seal during the pendency of the ex parte proceedings. Given these protections for Plaintiff's legitimate interests, the countervailing strong public interest in knowing who is seeking recourse in the federal courts compels the Court to deny Plaintiff's request to conceal its own identity, even initially. As the Seventh Circuit has explained, "We have repeatedly voiced our disfavor of parties proceeding anonymously, as anonymous litigation runs contrary to the rights of the public to have open judicial proceedings and to know who is using court facilities and procedures funded by public taxes. To proceed anonymously, a party must demonstrate exceptional circumstances that outweigh both the public policy in favor of identified parties and the prejudice to the opposing party that would result from anonymity." Doe v. Village of Deerfield, 819 F.3d 372, 376-77 (7th Cir. 2016). Accordingly, Schedule A [2-3] shall remain sealed until further court order. The Complaint 2, Exhibit 1 to the Complaint [2-1], Exhibit 2 to the Complaint [2-2], the USPTO Cover Sheet 4, and the Affiliate Disclosure 5 shall be unsealed, as Plaintiff has not established any basis for sealing those documents. See Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Leavell, 220 F.3d 562, 567-68 (7th Cir. 2000). For future reference, counsel is (a) advised that all motions must be accompanied by a notice of presentment and non-compliant motions may be stricken and (b) directed to review and comply with the case management procedures posted on Judge Hunt's webpage.Mailed notice |
05/07/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff names 538 defendants in this single case. However, after reviewing the complaint 1, the Court questions whether plaintiff has established sufficient grounds for joinder of all defendants under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). See Estee Lauder Cosmetics, Ltd. v. P'ships and Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A," 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D. Ill. 2020); Art Ask Agency v. Individuals, Corps. Ltd. Liab. Cos., P'ships and Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A," 21-cv-06197, 2021 WL 5493226 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 23, 2021); Bose Corp. v. P'ships and Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A," 334 F.R.D. 511 (N.D. Ill. 2020). By 5/21/24, Plaintiff is ordered to file a supplemental memorandum that refers to specific facts alleged in its filings and provides information associated with each Schedule A defendant to demonstrate that joinder is proper. Alternatively, by the same deadline, plaintiff may file under seal an amended schedule A with a subset of the defendants and a declaration that explains how each of these defendants is properly joined with each other. Any declaration must attach labeled exhibits that contain screenshots or other information specific only to the defendants listed on amended Schedule A. Mailed notice |
05/06/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
05/06/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (jcc,) |
05/06/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff RV, LLC to seal document sealed document 2, sealed document 4, sealed document 5 |
05/06/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff RV, LLC by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr |
05/06/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff RV, LLC Affiliate Disclosure |
05/06/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff RV, LLC USPTO Cover Sheet |
05/06/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
05/06/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff RV, LLC Complaint, Ex. 1, Ex. 2 and Schedule A 附件: 1:Exhibit Exhibit 1 2:Exhibit Exhibit 2 3:(Affidavit Schedule A) |
05/06/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by RV, LLC; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21932745. |
案件最新进展,来源于美国联邦法院,下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件:部分原告会选择隐匿发案,或者对提交的文件进行密封处理,因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开(一般PI阶段左右才会公开)。
诉状:诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型,以及诉讼请求,如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等,这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新,未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮