2022-cv-03281
日期 | 描述 |
---|---|
07/10/2023 | SATISFACTION of Judgment as to [Certain] defendants |
01/24/2023 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs Corrected Doc 37 - as to defendant no 40 HIFIWI Store |
01/24/2023 | SATISFACTION of Judgment as to defendant no. 40 HIFIWI Store |
01/10/2023 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: As an aside, the Court encountered some difficulties with the Word version of the proposed final judgment. The signature block included a line that this Court had trouble deleting. And it is not clear why the paragraphs were tabbed over by an eighth of an inch. There was no need for that mini-tab. And as a general matter, this Court prefers tabs for subheadings at a distance of half an inch (that is, a subheading "A" should be half an inch to the right). The Court directs counsel to submit a user-friendly version in any future case. Mailed notice |
01/10/2023 | FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 1/10/2023. Mailed notice. |
01/10/2023 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Dckt. No. 28) is hereby granted. The answers are long overdue. This Court previously ordered the entry of default against defendants. (Dckt. No. 27) The Court enters final judgment against all remaining Defendants. Final Judgment Order to follow. There are no remaining defendants. The case is closed. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
12/29/2022 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/29/2022: Mailed notice. |
12/13/2022 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to defendant no 8 Aiwan-YXJ Store and defendant no. 91 Shop1847698 Store |
11/30/2022 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd, Khara Inc. regarding order on motion for entry of default, text entry, 27, memorandum in support of motion 29, MOTION by Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd, Khara Inc. for default judgment as to The Defendants Identified In The First Amended Schedule A 28 |
11/30/2022 | MEMORANDUM by Ground Works Co., Ltd, Khara Inc. in support of motion for default judgment 28 附件: 1:Exhibit 1 2:(Exhibit 2) |
11/30/2022 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd, Khara Inc. for default judgment as to The Defendants Identified In The First Amended Schedule A |
11/30/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiffs' motion for entry of default (Dckt. No. 25) is hereby granted. The answers are overdue. The Court enters default under Rule 55(a) against all remaining Defendants. A motion for default judgment is due by December 9, 2022. A response is due by December 16, 2022. Defendants must file a motion if they seek a hearing. Plaintiffs must serve a copy of this Order on Defendants and file a certificate of service. The Court reminds counsel to submit a Word version of the proposed judgment to the proposed order inbox, and include an updated copy of Schedule A that removes any dismissed Defendants. Mailed notice |
11/29/2022 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to defendant no 45 Huledi |
11/28/2022 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd, Khara Inc. for entry of default Against The Defendants Identified In The First Amended Schedule A pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) 附件: 1:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt |
11/23/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The status report deadline of November 30, 2022 is vacated and reset for February 28, 2023. Mailed notice |
11/04/2022 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Khara Inc., Ground Works Co., Ltd as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 11/4/2022, answer due 11/25/2022. 附件: 1:(Declaration of Service) |
10/12/2022 | SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
10/11/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion to modify the TRO (Dckt. No. [21]) is hereby granted. The Court hereby modifies the TRO to remove the asset freeze and the temporary injunctive relief. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants and on any third party who received the original TRO. Mailed notice |
10/06/2022 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd, Khara Inc. Motion To Modify The Temporary Restraining Order To Withdraw The Request For Asset Freeze And Injunction |
10/04/2022 | SEALED TEMPORARY Restraining Order Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 10/4/2022. Mailed notice. |
10/04/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal (Dckt. No. [8]) is hereby granted. Plaintiff's motion for an ex parte TRO (Dckt. No. [10]) is hereby granted in part as stated in the accompanying order. Temporary Restraining Order to follow. For now, the Court is granting an asset freeze. But this Court is inclined to lift the asset freeze at a later time unless Plaintiff later seeks equitable monetary relief (like an accounting of profits) or unless Plaintiff can point this Court to a statute that expressly authorizes an asset freeze in connection with statutory damages. Plaintiff must effectuate service of process by October 7, 2022. Responses to the complaint are due by October 21, 2022. Motions for default and default judgment are due by October 24, 2022. Responses are due by October 27, 2022. A failure to comply will lead to dismissal. The Court directs counsel to serve a copy of this Order and any forthcoming motion on Defendants, and file a certificate of service. Mailed notice |
09/15/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The deadline to file a joint initial status report is extended to by November 30, 2022.Mailed notice. |
08/17/2022 | STATEMENT by Ground Works Co., Ltd, Khara Inc. Regarding Asset Freeze 附件: 1:Exhibit 1 2:Exhibit 2 3:(Exhibit 3) |
08/09/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed Plaintiff's motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order (Dckt. No. 10). The proposed minute order includes a request for an asset freeze. By August 19, 2022, Plaintiff must file a statement and point to the statutory provision that gives this Court the power to impose an asset freeze at the outset of the case. If Plaintiff cannot point to a specific statutory provision, then Plaintiff must address how its request for an asset freeze is consistent with Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 (1999). In its memo, Plaintiff argues that courts have the "inherent authority to grant Plaintiff's request for a prejudgment asset freeze to preserve the relief Plaintiff is seeking." See Mem., at 22.In Grupo Mexicano, the Supreme Court held that a district court has "no authority to issue a preliminary injunction preventing [a defendant] from disposing of their assets pending adjudication of [plaintiff's] contract claim for money damages." Id. at 333. The Supreme Court adhered to the long-standing rule that "a judgment establishing the debt was necessary before a court of equity would interfere with the debtor's use of his property." Id. at 321. "However, the [Grupo] [C]ourt specifically noted that a restraint on assets was still proper if a suit sought equitable relief." See CSC Holdings, Inc. v. Redisi, 309 F.3d 988, 996 (7th Cir. 2002) (citing Grupo, 527 U.S. at 333; Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp., 311 U.S. 282, 288 (1940)). "[A]s a general matter [] prejudgment asset restraints are not proper simply to establish a fund from which a later award of money damages can be satisfied." See Banister v. Firestone, 2018 WL 4224444, at *9 (N.D. Ill. 2018). An equitable restraint at the outset of the case might be doable if Plaintiff obtained equitable monetary relief at the end of the day, like an accounting of profits. See Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 2013 WL 12314399 (N.D. Ill. 2013). But as a practical matter, in Schedule A cases, that recovery almost never happens, if at all. Instead, plaintiffs rush into court, seek and obtain an asset freeze, obtain a default judgment, and then ask district courts to unfreeze the money and award statutory damages, not equitable relief. In that scenario, it is not clear to this Court that it would be appropriate to use any frozen funds for any recovery of statutory damages, because statutory damages are a remedy at law, not a remedy in equity. If Plaintiff believes that it is appropriate for this Court to freeze funds at the outset of the case, and then use those funds to recover statutory damages (not equitable monetary relief) at the end of the case, then Plaintiff must explain why. Mailed notice |
06/27/2022 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. |
06/24/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by September 16, 2022. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice |
06/24/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion to exceed page limitation (Dckt. No. 9) is granted. Mailed notice |
06/23/2022 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd, Khara Inc. Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Yasuhiro Kamimura regarding memorandum in support of motion, [11] |
06/23/2022 | MEMORANDUM In Support of [10] Ex Parte Motion 附件: 1:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt 2:Exhibit 1-4, Declaration of Keith Vogt 3:Declaration of Yasuhiro Kamimura 4:Exhibit 1, Declaration of Yasuhiro Kamimura |
06/23/2022 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd, Khara Inc. for leave to file excess pages |
06/23/2022 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd, Khara Inc. for leave to file [Certain] Documents Under Seal |
06/23/2022 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
06/23/2022 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd, Khara Inc. by Adam Grodman |
06/23/2022 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd, Khara Inc. by Yi Bu |
06/23/2022 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd, Khara Inc. by Yanling Jiang |
06/23/2022 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd, Khara Inc. by Keith A. Vogt |
06/23/2022 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
06/23/2022 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Ground Works Co., Ltd, Khara Inc. Schedule A to Complaint (1) |
06/23/2022 | COMPLAINT filed by Khara Inc., Ground Works Co., Ltd; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-19587666. 附件: 1:Exhibit 1 2:Exhibit 2 3:Exhibit 3 4:(Exhibit 4) |
案件最新进展,来源于美国联邦法院,下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件:部分原告会选择隐匿发案,或者对提交的文件进行密封处理,因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开(一般PI阶段左右才会公开)。
诉状:诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型,以及诉讼请求,如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等,这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新,未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮