最近更新：2024-12-25
2022-cv-00506
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 06/28/2024 | FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to certain Defendants |
| 06/28/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Triumph Designs, Ltd. by Martin Francis Trainor |
| 11/28/2023 | FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to a certain defendant |
| 06/02/2023 | FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment in the amount of $5,000 as to a certain Defendant |
| 01/20/2023 | FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment in the amount of $5,000 as to a certain Defendant |
| 01/13/2023 | FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment in the amount of $5,000 as to certain Defendants |
| 11/23/2022 | FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment in the amount of $5,000 as to a certain Defendant |
| 11/04/2022 | Schedule of Defendants' Frozen Funds by Triumph Designs, Ltd. |
| 10/24/2022 | FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 10/24/2022. Mailed notice. |
| 10/24/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Dckt. No. 44) is hereby granted as stated in the accompanying order. The answers were due on May 24, 2022 (Dckt. No. 25), so they are long overdue. Defendants have not responded to the complaint, and have not responded to the motion for default judgment. Final Judgment Order to follow. The case is closed. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice |
| 10/24/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: By November 4, 2022, Plaintiff must file a spreadsheet that identifies, by Defendant, the amount of funds frozen under this Court's temporary restraining order. Mailed notice |
| 10/17/2022 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Triumph Designs, Ltd. as to a certain Defendant |
| 10/11/2022 | MEMORANDUM by Triumph Designs, Ltd. in support of motion for default judgment, motion for entry of default, 44 附件： 1:Exhibit A 2:(Declaration in Support of Memorandum)(Sullivan, Ann Marie) |
| 10/11/2022 | MOTION by Plaintiff Triumph Designs, Ltd. for default judgment as to as to All Remaining Defendants, MOTION by Plaintiff Triumph Designs, Ltd. for entry of default as to All Remaining Defendants 附件： 1:(Exhibit Amended Schedule A)(Sullivan, Ann Marie) |
| 10/11/2022 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Triumph Designs, Ltd. as to a Certain Defendant (Sullivan, Ann Marie) |
| 10/04/2022 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 10/4/2022. Mailed notice. |
| 10/04/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (Dckt. No. 23) is hereby granted in part as stated in the forthcoming order. Preliminary Injunction Order to follow. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of the Preliminary Injunction Order and this Order on Defendants. The responses to the complaint are long overdue, but Plaintiff has not sought default. Any motion for default or default judgment is due by October 11, 2022. Plaintiff must serve a copy of any such motion on Defendants and file a certificate of service. A response is due by October 21, 2022. Mailed notice. |
| 09/02/2022 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Triumph Designs, Ltd. as to Certain Defendants (Sullivan, Ann Marie) |
| 08/19/2022 | STATEMENT by Triumph Designs, Ltd. Regarding Asset Restraint 38 (Sullivan, Ann Marie) |
| 08/09/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (Dckt. No. 23). The motion includes a request for an asset freeze. By August 19, 2022, Plaintiff must file a statement and point to the statutory provision that gives this Court the power to impose an asset freeze at the outset of the case. If Plaintiff cannot point to a specific statutory provision, then Plaintiff must address how its request for an asset freeze is consistent with Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 (1999). In its brief in support of a TRO, Plaintiff argues that "[c]ourts have the inherent authority to issue a prejudgment asset restraint when plaintiff's complaint seeks relief in equity." See Mem., at 13. In Grupo Mexicano, the Supreme Court held that a district court has "no authority to issue a preliminary injunction preventing [a defendant] from disposing of their assets pending adjudication of [plaintiff's] contract claim for money damages." Id. at 333. The Supreme Court adhered to the long-standing rule that "a judgment establishing the debt was necessary before a court of equity would interfere with the debtor's use of his property." Id. at 321. "However, the [Grupo] [C]ourt specifically noted that a restraint on assets was still proper if a suit sought equitable relief." See CSC Holdings, Inc. v. Redisi, 309 F.3d 988, 996 (7th Cir. 2002) (citing Grupo, 527 U.S. at 333; Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp., 311 U.S. 282, 288 (1940)). "[A]s a general matter [] prejudgment asset restraints are not proper simply to establish a fund from which a later award of money damages can be satisfied." See Banister v. Firestone, 2018 WL 4224444, at *9 (N.D. Ill. 2018). An equitable restraint at the outset of the case might be doable if Plaintiff obtained equitable monetary relief at the end of the day, like an accounting of profits. See Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 2013 WL 12314399 (N.D. Ill. 2013). But as a practical matter, in Schedule A cases, that recovery almost never happens, if at all. Instead, plaintiffs rush into court, seek and obtain an asset freeze, obtain a default judgment, and then ask district courts to unfreeze the money and award statutory damages, not equitable relief. In that scenario, it is not clear to this Court that it would be appropriate to use any frozen funds for any recovery of statutory damages, because statutory damages are a remedy at law, not a remedy in equity. If Plaintiff believes that it is appropriate for this Court to freeze funds at the outset of the case, and then use those funds to recover statutory damages (not equitable monetary relief) at the end of the case, then Plaintiff must explain why. Mailed notice. |
| 07/20/2022 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Triumph Designs, Ltd. as to Certain Defendants (Sullivan, Ann Marie) |
| 06/02/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: In light of the stipulation of dismissal (Dckt. No. 34), defendant's motions (Dckt. No. 28, 31 and 33) are denied as moot. Mailed notice. |
| 06/02/2022 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Triumph Designs, Ltd. as to Certain Defendants (Sullivan, Ann Marie) |
| 05/25/2022 | STIPULATION of Dismissal as to Def. 130. Newtonstein (Sullivan, Ann Marie) |
| 05/13/2022 | MOTION by Defendant Newtonstein Ltd. Expedited Consideration of Newtonstein's Motion to Modify and Unfreeze Accounts, Response in Opposition to Converting TRO, and for Extension of Time |
| 05/09/2022 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Newtonstein Ltd. by James Gregory Argionis |
| 05/09/2022 | MOTION by Defendant Newtonstein Ltd. for extension of time to file answer (Motion For Extension Of Time To Answer Or Otherwise Plead To The Amended Complaint) |
| 05/09/2022 | RESPONSE by Newtonstein Ltd.in Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Triumph Designs, Ltd. for preliminary injunction 23 (Response In Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion To Convert The April 8, 2022 TRO To A Preliminary Injunction) 附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
| 05/09/2022 | MEMORANDUM by Newtonstein Ltd. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 28 (Memorandum In Support Of Motion To Unfreeze Accounts In Light Of Expiration Of The April 8, 2022 TRO) 附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
| 05/09/2022 | MOTION by Defendant Newtonstein Ltd.Motion To Unfreeze Accounts In Light Of Expiration Of The April 8, 2022 TRO |
| 05/09/2022 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Newtonstein Ltd. |
| 05/09/2022 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Newtonstein Ltd. by Jack J. Carriglio |
| 05/03/2022 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Triumph Designs, Ltd. as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 5/3/2022, answer due 5/24/2022. 附件： 1:(Declaration of Service)(Sullivan, Ann Marie) |
| 05/03/2022 | MEMORANDUM by Triumph Designs, Ltd. in support of motion for preliminary injunction 23 附件： 1:(Declaration in Support of Memorandum)(Sullivan, Ann Marie) |
| 05/03/2022 | MOTION by Plaintiff Triumph Designs, Ltd. for preliminary injunction (Sullivan, Ann Marie) |
| 04/20/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for extension of the TRO (Dckt. No. 20) is hereby granted. The Court extends the TRO until 5:00 p.m. on May 6, 2022. Mailed notice |
| 04/19/2022 | REGISTRY DEPOSIT INFORMATION FORM by Triumph Designs, Ltd. |
| 04/19/2022 | MOTION by Plaintiff Triumph Designs, Ltd. for extension of time of the Temporary Restraining Order 17 附件： 1:Supplement Memorandum in Support of Motion 2:(Declaration of Alison Carter)(Sullivan, Ann Marie) |
| 04/19/2022 | BOND in the amount of $ 184,000 cashier's check, receipt number 4624270711, posted by Triumph Designs, Ltd. |
| 04/19/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court grants the motion to withdraw as counsel (Dckt. No. 18). Attorney Sofia Quezada is terminated as counsel of record.Mailed notice. |
| 04/18/2022 | MOTION by Attorney Sofia Quezada to withdraw as attorney for Triumph Designs, Ltd. No party information provided |
| 04/12/2022 | SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 04/08/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion to seal (Dckt. No. 15) is hereby granted. Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process (Dckt. No. 14) is hereby granted. Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order (Dckt. No. 12) is hereby granted. Temporary Restraining Order to follow. Mailed notice. |
| 02/02/2022 | MOTION by Plaintiff Triumph Designs, Ltd. for leave to file under seal |
| 02/02/2022 | MOTION by Plaintiff Triumph Designs, Ltd. for Electronic Service of Process 附件： 1:Supplement Memorandum in Support of Motion 2:Declaration in Support of Motion 3:(Exhibit 1-4) |
| 02/02/2022 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Triumph Designs, Ltd. Exhibit 2 - Part One 附件： 1:Exhibit Part Two 2:(Exhibit Part Three) |
| 02/02/2022 | MOTION by Plaintiff Triumph Designs, Ltd. for temporary restraining order 附件： 1:Supplement Memorandum in Support of Motion 2:Declaration in Support of Motion 3:(Exhibit 1) |
| 02/01/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: In light of this Court's ruling (Dckt. No. 9), the Court directs the Clerk's Office to update the docket to reflect Plaintiff's actual name. Mailed notice |
| 01/31/2022 | AMENDED complaint by XYZ Corporation against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A 附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
| 01/31/2022 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file certain documents under seal and temporarily proceed under a pseudonym (Dckt. No. 6) is hereby denied. It would be too much to say that the motion is unpersuasive, because the motion spans only one sentence. The Court refers Plaintiff to its prior ruling about filing under pseudonyms. See generally In re Boeing 737 MAX Pilots Litig., 2020 WL 247404 (N.D. Ill. 2020). The complaint does not comply with Rule 10(a), so it is hereby stricken. The Court grants Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint by February 11, 2022. Mailed notice. |
| 01/28/2022 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 01/28/2022 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. |
| 01/28/2022 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff XYZ Corporation Complaint 附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:(Exhibit 2 - Schedule A) |
| 01/28/2022 | MEMORANDUM by XYZ Corporation in support of motion for leave to file 6 Certain Documents under Seal and to Proceed Temporarily under a Pseudonym 附件： 1:Declaration of Ann Marie Sullivan 2:Declaration of Sandy Zhuang 3:Exhibit 1 4:Exhibit 2 5:(Exhibit 3) |
| 01/28/2022 | MOTION by Plaintiff XYZ Corporation for leave to file Certain Documents under Seal and to Proceed Temporarily under a Pseudonym |
| 01/28/2022 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff XYZ Corporation by Sofia Quezada |
| 01/28/2022 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff XYZ Corporation by Ann Marie Sullivan (Sullivan, Ann Marie) |
| 01/28/2022 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff XYZ Corporation by Alison Carter |
| 01/28/2022 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 01/28/2022 | COMPLAINT (Redacted) filed by XYZ Corporation; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0752-19102610. 附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:(Exhibit 2) |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
