最近更新：2025-02-25
2024-cv-00432
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 07/29/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion to reopen the case 40 and Defendant's motion for extension of time 43 are dismissed as moot. Accordingly, the motion hearing set for 8/1/2024 is stricken. Mailed notice. |
| 07/24/2024 | STIPULATION of Dismissal Joint Stipulation of Dismissal as to Defendant no. 51 RuiDA |
| 07/22/2024 | MOTION by Defendant RuiDA for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint 1 Second Unopposed Motion for Extension |
| 07/15/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: By request of the parties, the motion hearing set for 7/17/2024 is stricken and reset for 8/1/2024 at 10:00 A.M. Lead counsel must be present in person at that hearing. Mailed notice. |
| 07/12/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: An in-person hearing on Plaintiff's motion to reopen the case 40 is set for 7/17/2024 at 10:00 A.M. in Courtroom 2125. Lead counsel must be present in person at that hearing. Mailed notice. |
| 07/12/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke to reopen case Plaintiff's Motion to Reinstate Civil Action No. 1-24-cv-00432 |
| 07/11/2024 | DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 7/11/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 07/11/2024 | ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for default judgment [33] is granted. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 7/11/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 07/10/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke for default judgment as to Against the Defendants Identified in First Amended Schedule A |
| 07/05/2024 | NEW PARTIES: aisa84541, Faleleime Ladyskirts, xudafeng759, TANGXIAOJUN5762, chrenlin, anysiacrooks4977799, dingfan123, liuxingran2124, yufeifeier, shichengzhuo Store, lijianglonger, longying22085, Aoalygiver Toys, vcdfre33, liuxiaodong5771, PathumWan-Wear, liqianzheng1186, guofeins, wangmengdi1930, jiakexin473664, zhaoxiaoyan6542, HUIzhanzhongxin129, YIJIN23, WJN ARTWORK, Creemery Bedfits, YIJIN28, YIJIN29, YIJIN54, jianlin supper-market, PeiFang0., xiayuanyuan1529, Shaozhicheng246, tracey gord, longchengaizha, yangjianbin123, qiyuxing19291, zhangleig, guoshupingshop, e4uuzd, surprise hui, Xhxgcgccvxgfhfcgcfc, S6D6F6, anmin123, yangjiuting, liufangyuan59937, Pafiwmq52a, zailiming1309, Xingchen56895, zhangshuxial;, luying51372, ladylong, wangwanchuang2109, jeffrygrant291, yuyuexin6547, Daxiezany Pants, fengkai9864, Fengyiyuany, Yanzishishangdianpu, caoguiping2737, MoLu088, liuhongjuans, goumingxun Store, sunyuan00852, kongmlng12345, wangliwen3426, chenyuran01511, Knorbrand, W EERT, Veincony Bags, liuyujian94755, CHENDUFJSKV, Platanos Sancochados, cjwlwkeoqwjz, Kristinesmgl, huangcz1991, beijin0544, liujnuo, GUOHAILONG8914 and YGFHAOHAO added to case caption. |
| 07/05/2024 | NEW PARTIES: Muke, Beijing Tanke Chuangxin Keji Youxian Gongsi, changshayinzhangguimaoyiyouxiangongsi, WeiJinShangMao, danduodaobao55, xuehai, DeRong-BYFW, Buck That!, JIUJIUfaf, awpoekdioj, zuichudesecai, Binhhip, piprintondemand, obsongchen, GiantCuteDepartmentStore, her3i2, wenjie057, lisongyang3698, egarwTEGE, liwenxang74380166, FGDS88FF, Cultural Band, Jauwkf, SunYuanQiang, luweizhang7797, kouyue3048, K8K8K8, Songmingjiang5522, Haersenfuny shaver, YIJIN20, wudaoyun1885, JJYYUU66, Tiger Industries, zhangyanerer, jing789youlove, liruihuan1134, Fiorenzi, John O'Neill66, zuoshiyin3237, fcdsfs, Ronavigation, chexixnhey, meilei1, panchenyu7513, hanxiangsheng, liyun1314, TINGtt94012, rongshuli7755, xieqingquan666666, liyang0418, Jionsyduby Coats, Zhong Peng Fashion Trade Company, linkong, cdijnvir90, chengjikejiguangyue, Family Garden, zhangmingli6107, luettgenmaritza, wanghao7141, lijiaxing4477, world 58, YIN-SHUD.VHUV, lu shan228, KAI.jiajsq, wutingting6705, hasiriy, qucaiyu45678, Deileishuer cots and Saphire Alexus Reyes added to case caption. |
| 07/05/2024 | NEW PARTIES: kemuhua, Jinhan Trading Co. Ltd, Joybuy, yu dun gao shang mao, QZBON CE Co.ltd, jue jiang la dian zi, Huizhou Jinou Technology Co., Ltd., tai yuan bo yi lai dian zi shang wu you xian gong si, guai qin ke mao, ju jue li mao yi, LNWH LLC, Zhengdao, FANGZE, atingshangmao, shenzhenshiyingjiushipinyouxiangongsi, kong lai ha dian zi shang, pu jue qiang, shi jue pan ya shang mao, chun tu qin dian zi, Housester, ShangHaiNianRuJiaoWangLuoKeJiYouXianGongSi, Mian yang bo yuan lai ke ji you xian gong si, nanjingyiyushushangmao, XuanMing, jinanxinkaizhishangmaoyouxiangongsi, WanHuaiDongKeJi, NiceCo, oudi co.,ltd, WGR LLC, FORHDW Co.Ltd, LLWOLE, TROUYANG Co., Ltd., YIWANS Co., Ltd., Chytaii Toys Co. ltd, Kitchen Plus Home, Partygee, Bemaystar, tmosphere, Gratying, Cobbeko CO., LTD, Mengduolai, Tapesb, Boanda Trading Co. Ltd., quanzhoutaishangtouziqubibaoshangmaoyouxiangongsi, BBZJ-US, Athenstics Stainless steel cup, Nantong Huaqiao Textile Co., Ltd., taiyuanshilonghudianzishangwu co.ltd, yuanzhe and DYT added to case caption. |
| 07/03/2024 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 7/3/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 07/03/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 21 is granted. Enter separate preliminary injunction order. Plaintiff's filings establish that Plaintiff has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk Defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of Plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors Plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit or infringing goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established 25 that it provided electronic notice to Defendants of the pendency of this case and provided a link to a website containing relevant case documents, but, despite the Court having provided 24 the opportunity to do so, no remaining Defendant has objected to the motion for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that all Defendants listed on Schedule A are added to the docket within five business days. The Clerk is directed to unseal any and all previously-sealed documents. Mailed notice. |
| 06/28/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Defendant 51 RuiDA's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint 28 is granted. Defendants 51 RuiDA must answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint on or before 7/24/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 06/27/2024 | MOTION by Defendant RuiDA for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint[1] Unopposed Motion to Extend |
| 06/18/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to Defendant no. 3 Joybuy |
| 06/13/2024 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke regarding order on motion for preliminary injunction, text entry, 24 |
| 06/13/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion 21 for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, which is entered and continued, Plaintiff must forthwith serve all remaining Defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no Defendant appears and objects on or before 6/19/2024." Plaintiff must file proof of service of the Court's statement within two business days of service. For the reasons stated in the Court's order 17 entering the temporary restraining order ("TRO"), the TRO is extended to and including the date on which the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice. |
| 06/12/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke for preliminary injunction |
| 06/05/2024 | SURETY BOND in the amount of $10,000 posted by Jonas Sebastian Jodicke. (Document not scanned) |
| 06/03/2024 | NOTICE of Correction |
| 06/03/2024 | ENTERED IN ERROR Modified on 6/3/2024. |
| 06/03/2024 | SUMMONS Issued as to kemuhua and all other Defendants identified in the Complaint |
| 06/03/2024 | SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 6/3/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 06/03/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 12, motion for leave to file excess pages 13, and ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order 14, which includes a motion for electronic service of process, are granted in part. Plaintiff's submissions (e.g., Dkt. 15-1 at 14) establish that, were Defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of Plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that Defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, Plaintiff may for now file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal and appearing at docket entries 2 and 16. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall also be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis under FRCP 65(b)(1). Specifically, and as noted above, were Defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating Plaintiff's interests in identifying Defendants, stopping Defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining the equitable accounting that, at this point, Plaintiff states that he may pursue. These facts justify, among other relief, the imposition of a prejudgment asset restraint against Defendants in an amount not to exceed $50,000 per separate account. In addition, the Court finds, at least for now on this limited and one-sided record and without prejudice to revisiting the issue, that it has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because they directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois. Specifically, Defendants have targeted sales to Illinois residents by setting up and operating e-commerce stores that target United States consumers using one or more Seller Aliases, offer shipping to the United States, including Illinois, accept payment in U.S. dollars, and have sold products using infringing versions of Plaintiff's copyrighted works to residents of Illinois. The evidence presented to the Court also shows that Plaintiff has demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to Plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by infringing goods, and there is no countervailing harm to Defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to Defendants. As several judges have previously noted, there may be reason to question both the propriety of joining all Defendants in this one action and whether Plaintiff will pursue an accounting (which Plaintiff asserts as justification for an asset freeze), but at this preliminary stage, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity and the prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all Defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify Defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any Defendant appears and objects, the Court will reconsider the asset freeze and joinder. Enter sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Mailed notice. |
| 01/19/2024 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Jonas Sebastian Jodicke regarding memorandum in support of motion, 15 附件： 1:Exhibit 2-1 2:(Exhibit 2-2) |
| 01/19/2024 | MEMORANDUM in support of 14 Exparte motion 附件： 1:Declaration of Keith A. Vogt 2:Exhibit 1-4, of Keith A. Vogt's declaration 3:Declaration of Jonas Sebastian Jodicke 4:(Exhibit 1, of Jonas Sebastian Jodicke's declaration) |
| 01/19/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 01/19/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). |
| 01/19/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke for leave to file excess pages |
| 01/19/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke for leave to file under seal |
| 01/18/2024 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 01/17/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke by Christopher Romero |
| 01/17/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke by Monica Rita Martin |
| 01/17/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre |
| 01/17/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke by Adam Grodman |
| 01/17/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke by Yi Bu |
| 01/17/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke by Yanling Jiang |
| 01/17/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke by Keith A. Vogt |
| 01/17/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 01/17/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Jonas Sebastian Jodicke Schedule A to Complaint 1 |
| 01/17/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by Jonas Sebastian Jodicke; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21532151. 附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:Exhibit 2 3:Exhibit 3 4:(Exhibit 4) |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
