最近更新：2024-12-25
2024-cv-05218
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 12/20/2024 | RESPONSE by Defendants AMTLJ-US, Auriani-US, BONFOTO, Lanyuantai, NovoNost-us, PANYINYING, Qirui-US, CY Direct US, Legee Tech, iphoto digit, Pixel Lighting to objection to report and recommendations[239] |
| 12/20/2024 | RESPONSE by Defendant AIXIANGPAI 101089568 to objection to report and recommendations[239] |
| 12/20/2024 | RESPONSE by Defendants Weilisi, Kaiess to objection to report and recommendations[239] in support of the 11/18/2024 Report and Recommendation [235] |
| 12/04/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court sets the following briefing schedule on Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge Gilbert's 11/18/2024 Report and Recommendation [235]: Defendants' response is due 12/20/2024. Plaintiff's reply is due 1/3/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 12/02/2024 | OBJECTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC to report and recommendations, [235] |
| 11/25/2024 | RESPONSE by Defendants AMTLJ-US, Auriani-US, BONFOTO, NovoNost-us, PANYINYING, Qirui-US, CY Direct US, Legee Tech, iphoto digit, Pixel Lighting to status report[233] Legee Tech Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Severance Proposal |
| 11/19/2024 | OBJECTIONS by Aixiangpai, ATKTTOP Direct, AIXIANGPAI 101089568 to status report[233] per Order [DE 236] |
| 11/19/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's status report [233], which proposes severing this case into a total of five cases, consistent with the Court's recent ruling on Defendants Luxsure-US and Yarrashop Direct's Amended Emergency Motion to Dismiss for Improper Joinder [230]. However, Plaintiff's status report does not indicate whether its severance proposal is opposed. By 11/25/2024, the Defendants listed in 2-4 of Plaintiff's status report shall file a response to Plaintiff's severance proposal. Additionally, Defendants listed in 2-4 of Plaintiff's status report have each filed a motion to dismiss. Regardless of whether the Court severs these Defendants from this action, the Defendants' motions to dismiss will remain live, as those motions raise arguments beyond improper joinder. Mailed notice. |
| 11/18/2024 | REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction [68] be denied as to Responding Defendants (identified in footnote 2), excluding the Bonded Defendants (identified in footnote 1), for the reasons discussed in this Report and Recommendation. In accordance with Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are advised that "[w]ithin 14 days after being served with a copy of [the report and recommendation], a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after being served with a copy." See also 28 U.S.C § 636(b)(1)(C). Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 11/18/2024. Mailed notice |
| 11/15/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: This is a "Schedule A" case, which is a type of lawsuit typically filed against a group of sellers whose assumed names are listed on an attachment to the complaint, usually called "Schedule A." Oakley, Inc. v. P'ships & Unincorporated, 2021 WL 308882, at *1 (N.D. Ill. January 30, 2021). Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for default judgment as to certain Defendants. R. 225, Mot. Default; R. 226, Memo. Default. The Court denies the motion [225] without prejudice for the following reasons. First, Plaintiff asserts it is entitled to a reasonable royalty of $10,000 plus 10% of defaulting Defendants sales of unauthorized products pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284. In support of the $10,000 licensing fee, Plaintiff cites to the Declaration of Sason Gabay. Decl. Gabay 8. However, Plaintiff does not explain its calculation of the 10% of defaulting Defendants' sales of unauthorized products. Instead, Plaintiff includes a table with a column titled "10% Royalty of Sales by Defendant" without explanation, citation, or supporting documentation. Memo. at 11-12. Further, by the title of the column, it appears that Plaintiff is including all sales by the Defaulting Defendant, and it is not limited to only sales of the authorized products. Second, Plaintiff requests transaction costs, and cites one out-of-district case supporting this request, while maintaining that "courts have routinely held that a hypothetical license negotiation would have required transaction costs, which would be paid by the Defaulting Defendants." Id. at 9. However, Plaintiff does not support this request with any in-district case law or additional supporting authority, or describe how it arrived at the $5,000 per Defaulting Defendant transaction cost amount. Instead, Plaintiff cites to the amount of attorney's fees incurred in this case. Id. (citing Decl. Lee 9). It does not follow that a hypothetical license negotiation estimate would be the amount of the attorney's fees incurred in this case, which involves prosecuting alleged patent infringement. Finally, Plaintiff requests treble damages for each Defaulting Defendant. Memo. at 9. True, enhanced damages up to three times the amount are allowed under Section 284, but the Court is not convinced such enhanced damages are necessarily appropriate here. Based on the Court's review of the two cases cited in Plaintiff's memorandum following its request for treble damages, both cases were out-of-district, and none concerned Schedule A patent infringement cases. In any renewed default motion, Plaintiff must support its request for each category of damages with supporting authority, and to explain its methodology and calculation of the royalty of sales per each Defaulting Defendant, with supporting documentation. If Plaintiff continues to request treble the amount of Defaulting Defendants' profits for the unauthorized sales, any renewed motion must further support the basis for the request for enhanced damages and cite other patent "Schedule A" cases from this District, in which the court has awarded enhanced damages. Mailed notice. |
| 11/15/2024 | STATUS Report by Pathway IP LLC Presented before District Judge |
| 11/14/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Defendant Lanyuantai's status report regarding motion to recover damages for Plaintiff's wrongful TRO [231]. For the reasons stated in the status report, Defendant Lanyuantai's motion [227] is terminated as moot. Mailed notice. |
| 11/12/2024 | STATUS Report REGARDING MOTION TO RECOVER DAMAGES FOR PLAINTIFFS WRONGFUL TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (ECF 227) by Lanyuantai Presented before District Judge |
| 11/08/2024 | ORDER: Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 11/8/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 11/08/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons in the attached Order, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants Luxsure-US and Yarrashop Direct's Amended Emergency Motion to Dismiss for Improper Joinder [105]. Enter Order. Defendants Luxsure-US and Yarrashop Direct have been misjoined in this action, and the claims against those Defendants are severed from this action. The Clerk of Court is directed to open a new case as to Defendant Luxsure-US and Defendant Yarrashop Direct and to assign such action to this Court. Pathway is required to pay the filing fee. Based on this ruling, by November 15, 2024 the Court orders Pathway to file a status report as to whether it will be proceeding as to the remaining Defendants in one action or grouping Defendants in separate actions. Based on that status report, the Court will set new deadlines for an Amended Complaint in this original action, and any severed actions. Mailed notice. |
| 11/08/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Defendant Lanyuantai's motion to recover damages for wrongful temporary restraining order [227]. Plaintiff may file a response, limited to four pages, by 11/12/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 11/06/2024 | MOTION by Defendant Lanyuantai TO RECOVER DAMAGES FOR WRONGFUL TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Presented before District Judge 附件： 1:Exhibit 1 |
| 11/05/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Pathway IP LLC in support of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment, [225] 附件： 1:Declaration of Nicholas S. Lee 2:Declaration of Sason Gabay |
| 11/05/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC for entry of default Presented before District Judge, MOTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC for default judgment as to Defendants listed in Exhibit A Presented before District Judge 附件： 1:Exhibit A |
| 10/31/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is certain Defendants' motion for scheduling conference and expedited hearing on Defendant's motions to dismiss for misjoinder and dissolve preliminary injunction [218]. Certain Defendants have also filed a notice of motion for presentment for hearing on 11/05/2024 at 4:00 p.m. [222] The Court reminds the parties that pursuant to its Standing Order, "[p]arties are not to schedule motion presentment hearings. Parties should not contact the Court's Courtroom Deputy about scheduling a motion presentment hearing. If a party believes a motion presentment hearing is necessary, the party must file a motion requesting a hearing on the docket, which must indicate whether the opposing party opposes the motion, and setting forth a brief explanation as to why a hearing is necessary." As the Court understands the purpose of certain Defendants' motion for hearing was to bring to the Court's attention certain Defendants' pending motions, the Court does not believe the hearing is necessary at this time. Certain Defendants' motions remain under advisement. As to certain Defendants request for a Rule 16 conference, that request is denied. The Court reminds the parties that this matter was referred to Judge Gilbert for the purposes of discovery supervision, and Judge Gilbert has previously entered a Rule 16 Scheduling Order. R. 191. For the foregoing reasons, the motion is denied, and the Court strikes the presentment of hearing date. [218][222] Mailed notice. |
| 10/30/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Defendants' Luxsure-US and Yarrashop Direct's Amended Emergency Motion to Dismiss for Improper Joinder [105]. The Court has received inquiry as to the status of ruling on the pending motion. As to the label of the pending motion as an "emergency," pursuant to the Court's Standing Order, the Court hears "emergency motions only in exceptional circumstances after making a preliminary determination of whether an actual emergency exists. Emergency matters must be of such a nature that a delay in hearing them would cause serious harm to one or more of the parties." Here, Defendants' motion requests dismissal for misjoinder. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, "[m]isjoinder of parties is not a ground for dismissing an action. On motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party. The court may also sever any claim against a party." Accordingly, as Rule 21 is generally not a ground for dismissal, and because the Court can at any time add or drop a party, the motion is not an emergency. The motion remains under advisement. Mailed notice. |
| 10/30/2024 | NOTICE of Motion by Jianyin Liu for presentment of motion for hearing, [218] before Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 11/5/2024 at 04:00 PM. 附件： 1:Exhibit A- Motion [DE 218] |
| 10/29/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: The Court has reviewed the Motion for Scheduling Conference and Expedited Hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Misjoinder and Dissolve Preliminary Injunction [218]. The Court further notes that the Motion for Status Conference [216] was stricken by the Moving Defendants ATKTTOP Direct, Aixiangpai and AIXIANGPAI, see [217]. In the pending Motion [218], the Moving Defendants seek a status conference regarding the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [116], Motion to Dismiss for Misjoinder [111] and Motion to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction [104], but those motions are before the District Judge. Therefore, this Motion [218] is improperly presented before the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff must notice the Motion [218] for presentment before Judge Valderrama. Mailed notice |
| 10/29/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Pathway IP LLC Under Rule 41(a)(1) Lanyuantai (Defendant 53) without prejudice |
| 10/28/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Weilisi, Kaiess by Ziqi Yu |
| 10/21/2024 | MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, ATKTTOP Direct, AIXIANGPAI 101089568 for hearing re MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Presented before Magistrate Judge [116], MOTION by Defendant ATKTTOP Directto Dissolve Preliminary Injunction [DE 100] Against Defendant Presented before Magistrate Judge [104], MOTION by Defendants AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct, Aixiangpai to sever Presented before Magistrate Judge [111] for Status Conference Pursuant to Local Rules 16.1 Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 10/21/2024 | NOTICE by Aixiangpai, ATKTTOP Direct, AIXIANGPAI 101089568 re MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, ATKTTOP Direct, AIXIANGPAI 101089568 for hearing re MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Presented before Magistrate Judge [116], MOT[216] of Striking Filing of Motion for Status Conference [DE 216] |
| 10/21/2024 | MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, ATKTTOP Direct, AIXIANGPAI 101089568 for hearing re MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Presented before Magistrate Judge [116], MOTION by Defendants AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct, Aixiangpai to sever Presented before Magistrate Judge [111] for Status Conference Pursuant to Local Rules 16.1 Presented before District Judge |
| 10/16/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Pathway IP LLC Under Rule 41(a)(1) DONGDONG (Defendant 82) with prejudice |
| 10/09/2024 | REPLY by Kaiess to response in opposition to motion, [206] TO DISMISS FILED BY DEFENDANT KAIESS AND DEFENDANT WEILISI |
| 10/04/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Weilisi, Kaiess |
| 10/04/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants BLights, EESTOREAMZ, Herrflk, STALLY, Sensyne, Vlogging US, Wanfaau, WisaKey, XITENG TECH by Stevenson Moore |
| 10/02/2024 | SUPPLEMENT to report of rule 26(f) planning meeting[152] (Joint) |
| 10/02/2024 | REPLY by Defendants AMTLJ-US, Auriani-US, BONFOTO, CY Direct US, Lanyuantai, Legee Tech, NovoNost-us, PANYINYING, Pixel Lighting, Qirui-US, iphoto digit to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, [124] |
| 10/02/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by AMTLJ-US, Auriani-US, BONFOTO, CY Direct US, Lanyuantai, Legee Tech, NovoNost-us, PANYINYING, Pixel Lighting, Qirui-US, iphoto digit |
| 10/02/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct, Aixiangpai |
| 09/30/2024 | REPLY by AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct, Aixiangpai to MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Presented before Magistrate Judge [116], MOTION by Defendants AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct, Aixiangpai to sever Presented before Magistrate Judge [111] 附件： 1:Exhibit A- FLSD Order on Improper Joinder Differentiatng Bose |
| 09/25/2024 | RESPONSE by Pathway IP LLCin Opposition to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Kaiess Defendant Weilisi; MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED OR FOR MISJOINDER Presented before District Judge [140] |
| 09/23/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File its Reply in Support of its Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction Instanter [204] is granted. Mailed notice |
| 09/21/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC for leave to file Plaintiff's Reply in Support of its Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction Instanter Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 09/21/2024 | REPLY by Pathway IP LLC to response in opposition to motion, [130], Response, [134], response in opposition to motion, [132], response in opposition to motion, [131], response in opposition to motion, [133], Response, [137] 附件： 1:Exhibit 1 |
| 09/20/2024 | Plaintiff's ANSWER to counterclaim by Certain Defendants [129] and Affirmative Defenses by Pathway IP LLC |
| 09/18/2024 | RESPONSE by Pathway IP LLCin Opposition to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants AMTLJ-US, Auriani-US, BONFOTO, CY Direct US, Lanyuantai, Legee Tech, NovoNost-us, PANYINYING, Pixel Lighting, Qirui-US, iphoto digit MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON W[124] 附件： 1:Exhibit 1 |
| 09/18/2024 | RESPONSE by Pathway IP LLCin Opposition to MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Presented before Magistrate Judge [116], MOTION by Defendants AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct, Aixiangpai to sever Presented before Magistrate Judge [111] 附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:Exhibit 2 |
| 09/17/2024 | Plaintiff's ANSWER to counterclaim by Certain Defendants [122] and Affirmative Defenses by Pathway IP LLC |
| 09/17/2024 | Plaintiff's ANSWER to counterclaim by Certain Defendants [121] and Affirmative Defenses by Pathway IP LLC |
| 09/17/2024 | Plaintiff's ANSWER to counterclaim by Certain Defendants [120] and Affirmative Defenses by Pathway IP LLC |
| 09/17/2024 | Plaintiff's ANSWER to counterclaim By Certain Defendants [118] and Affirmative Defenses by Pathway IP LLC |
| 09/17/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Unicucp US |
| 09/17/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Woputne-US |
| 09/17/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Okshopping |
| 09/17/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the unopposed motion, Defendant Jianjin's first motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to complaint [189] is granted. Defendant Jianjin's responsive pleading due 09/30/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 09/17/2024 | RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 9/17/2024. Mailed notice |
| 09/16/2024 | REPLY by ATKTTOP Direct to MOTION by Defendant ATKTTOP Directto Dissolve Preliminary Injunction [DE 100] Against Defendant Presented before Magistrate Judge [104] |
| 09/16/2024 | MOTION by Defendant jianjin company for extension of time to file answer (Unopposed) Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 09/16/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motions, Defendants' unopposed motions for withdrawal are granted [175][176][177][178][179][180][181][182][183][184][185][186][187]. Attorney Ping Gu of Zhong Lun Law Firm is withdrawn as counsel for Defendants, iphotoxx, Lixinshunyi, Photo Guard, RUIHOTOR, catchpiccus, HiFocusiUS, QiHuichang, ShiQiaoShang, VividNWUS, XingBoom, XuanXiuUS, Jinsnow, and ShutterLight. Defendants remain represented by attorneys at Glacier Law LLP. Mailed notice. |
| 09/14/2024 | MOTION by Attorney Ping Gu to withdraw as attorney for ShutterLight. No party information provided Presented before Magistrate Judge 附件： 1:Certificate of Service |
| 09/14/2024 | MOTION by Attorney Ping Gu to withdraw as attorney for Jinsnow. No party information provided Presented before Magistrate Judge 附件： 1:Certificate of Service |
| 09/14/2024 | MOTION by Attorney Ping Gu to withdraw as attorney for XuanXiuUS. No party information provided Presented before Magistrate Judge 附件： 1:Certificate of Service |
| 09/14/2024 | MOTION by Attorney Ping Gu to withdraw as attorney for XingBoom. No party information provided Presented before Magistrate Judge 附件： 1:Certificate of Service |
| 09/14/2024 | MOTION by Attorney Ping Gu to withdraw as attorney for VividNWUS. No party information provided Presented before Magistrate Judge 附件： 1:Certificate of Service |
| 09/14/2024 | MOTION by Attorney Ping Gu to withdraw as attorney for ShiQiaoShang. No party information provided Presented before Magistrate Judge 附件： 1:Certificate of Service |
| 09/14/2024 | MOTION by Attorney Ping Gu to withdraw as attorney for QiHuichang. No party information provided Presented before Magistrate Judge 附件： 1:Certificate of Service |
| 09/14/2024 | MOTION by Attorney Ping Gu to withdraw as attorney for HiFocusiUS. No party information provided Presented before Magistrate Judge 附件： 1:Certificate of Service |
| 09/14/2024 | MOTION by Attorney Ping Gu to withdraw as attorney for catchpiccus. No party information provided Presented before Magistrate Judge 附件： 1:Certificate of Service |
| 09/14/2024 | MOTION by Attorney Ping Gu to withdraw as attorney for RUIHOTOR. No party information provided Presented before Magistrate Judge 附件： 1:Certificate of Service |
| 09/14/2024 | MOTION by Attorney Ping Gu to withdraw as attorney for Photo Guard. No party information provided Presented before Magistrate Judge 附件： 1:Certificate of Service |
| 09/13/2024 | MOTION by Attorney Ping Gu to withdraw as attorney for Lixinshunyi. No party information provided Presented before Magistrate Judge 附件： 1:Certificate of Service |
| 09/13/2024 | MOTION by Attorney Ping Gu to withdraw as attorney for iphotoxx. No party information provided Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 09/13/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief [173] is granted. Plaintiff shall file its Reply in Support of its Motion for Preliminary Injunction by 9/20/24. Mailed notice |
| 09/12/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC for extension of time to file response/reply as to order on motion for preliminary injunction, text entry, set motion and R&R deadlines/hearings, [99] Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 09/12/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, Defendants' unopposed motion for withdrawal is granted [166]. Attorneys Cameron Nelson and Jacqueline Brousseau of Greenberg Traurig LLP are withdrawn as counsel for Defendants, iphotoxx, Lixinshunyi, Photo Guard, RUIHOTOR, catchpiccus, HiFocusiUS, QiHuichang, ShiQiaoShang, VividNWUS, XingBoom, XuanXiuUS, Jinsnow, and ShutterLight. Defendants remain represented by attorneys at Glacier Law LLP. Mailed notice. |
| 09/11/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: Status hearing held on 9/11/24. The Court reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and Proposed Discovery Schedule [152]. By 9/16/24, the parties shall submit a revised Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order to the Court at Proposed_order_gilbert@ilnd.uscourts.gov that incorporates the discovery schedule set by the Court and the additional paragraphs discussed on the record. By 10/2/24, the parties shall file a supplement to their Rule 26 Report [152] that includes the information specified in paragraph 7(g) of the appendix to Local Patent Rule 3.5(b). The parties shall file an updated joint status report on the parties' progress with the Rule 26 Scheduling Order by 12/3/24. Mailed notice |
| 09/11/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction [68] is opposed by several Defendants, and the Court entered a briefing schedule as to those Defendants opposing entry of a preliminary injunction [99]. The Court refers the opposed motion for preliminary injunction to Magistrate Judge Gilbert. This Minute Entry does not impact the preliminary injunction order previously entered against non-appearing Defendants [100]. Mailed notice. |
| 09/11/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion for leave to file amended notification of affiliates under seal [163]. Mailed notice. |
| 09/11/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Counter-Plaintiff Bekada's notice of dismissal [160]. Pursuant to the terms of the notice of dismissal, Counter-Plaintiff Bekada dismisses with prejudice any and all counterclaims against Counter-Defendant Pathway IP LLC. Mailed notice. |
| 09/11/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by BLights, EESTOREAMZ, Herrflk, STALLY, Sensyne, Vlogging US, Wanfaau, WisaKey, XITENG TECH |
| 09/11/2024 | MOTION by Attorney Cameron Nelson and Jacqueline Brousseau to withdraw as attorney for HiFocusiUS, Jinsnow, Lixinshunyi, Photo Guard, QiHuichang, RUIHOTOR, ShiQiaoShang, ShutterLight, VividNWUS, XingBoom, XuanXiuUS, catchpiccus, iphotoxx. No party information provided Presented before District Judge |
