最近更新：2024-12-25
2022-cv-23504
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 03/10/2023 | PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal 25. Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss a claim prior to a defendant's filing of an answer or a motion for summary judgment, or after an answer has been filed where the dismissal bears the signatures of both parties. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). In this case, no answer has been filed. Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Stipulation, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-styled cause is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 3/9/2023. |
| 03/08/2023 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by Zuru, Inc. |
| 02/28/2023 | ORDER denying ex parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order 9 and Renewed Motion for Alternate Service 13 ; closing case. Within fourteen (14) days of this Order, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint consistent with this Order. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 2/28/2023. See attached document for full details. |
| 02/16/2023 | Notice of Ninety Days Expiring SINCE THE TIME TO OBJECT ENDED by ZURU INC. re 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 9 Plaintiff's MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by ZURU INC. |
| 02/09/2023 | Notice of Ninety Days Expiring SINCE THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATE JUDGE ENTERED HER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF 16 FILED NOVEMBER 11, 2022) THAT THE PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (ECF 9 FILED OCTOBER 28, 2022) SHOULD BE GRANTED by ZURU INC. re 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 9 Plaintiff's MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by ZURU INC. |
| 02/02/2023 | Notice of Ninety Days Expiring by ZURU INC. re 9 Plaintiff's MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by ZURU INC., 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 9 Plaintiff's MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by ZURU INC. 附件： 1:(Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) |
| 01/05/2023 | PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate or Continue Deadlines Pending the Court's Issuance of an Order Based on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. 19. Therein, Plaintiff requests an extension of time to hold its joint scheduling conference until the Court issues a ruling on Magistrate Judge Louis' Report and Recommendations 16 regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 9 and Plaintiff's Motion for Alternate Service of Process 13. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion 19 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's deadline to file its joint scheduling report as set by this Court's October 28, 2022 Paperless Order (ECF No. 5) is continued until after this Court rules on the Plaintiff's outstanding Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 9, its Motion for Alternate Service of Process 13, and Judge Louis's Report and Recommendations 16. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 1/5/2023. |
| 01/03/2023 | Plaintiff's MOTION to Vacate or Continue Deadlines Pending the Court's Issuance of an Order Based on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to Grant the Temporary Restraining Order by ZURU INC. Responses due by 1/17/2023 附件： 1:Text of Proposed Order |
| 11/12/2022 | PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion to Shorten Time for Objections to Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Entry of Temporary Restraining Order. 17. Therein, Plaintiff requests that the Court shorten the objections period specified in Magistrate Judge Louis's Report and Recommendation 16 because "seven days is a long time in a counterfeiting investigation." See 17 at 2. Yet while Plaintiff claims that shortening the objections period is permissible "[w]here exigencies exist," see id., it points to no specific exigency meriting that relief in this case. See generally id. Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion 17 is DENIED. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/12/2022. |
| 11/11/2022 | MOTION to Shorten the Time for Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation entered at DE #16 re [16] REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re [9] Plaintiff's MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by ZURU INC. by ZURU INC. |
| 11/11/2022 | REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re [9] Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Objections to R&R due by November 21, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis on 11/11/2022. See attached document for full details. |
| 11/08/2022 | SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 15 [misc] restricted/sealed until further notice. (745753) |
| 11/07/2022 | ORDER granting Plaintiff's 8 Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis on 11/7/2022. See attached document for full details. |
| 11/01/2022 | Renewed MOTION for Alternate Service of Process re 8 Plaintiff's MOTION to Seal Specific Documents per Local Rule 5.4, 12 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, by ZURU INC. 附件： 1:Affidavit Declaration of Joel Rothman 2:(Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order on Motion for Alternate Service) |
| 11/01/2022 | PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff Zuru Inc.'s Ex Parte Motion for Order Authorizing Alternate Service of Process On Defendants Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3). 7. Therein, Plaintiff requests that the Court permit it to serve the Defendants identified on "Schedule A," who it avers are foreign entities, through publication online. See id. at 24, 1112. Yet Plaintiff fails to attach any such "Schedule A" to its Complaint or attachments. See generally (ECF No. 1). Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion 7 is DENIED. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/1/2022. |
| 11/01/2022 | PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING MOTIONS. PURSUANT to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned cause is hereby referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis to take all necessary and proper action as required by law and/or issue a Report and Recommendation regarding Plaintiff Zuru Inc.'s Motion to Seal 8 and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 9. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/1/2022. |
| 11/01/2022 | PAPERLESS PRETRIAL ORDER. This is a duplicate on DE 5. Deleted text per chambers. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/1/2022. (fpi) Modified on 11/1/2022 |
| 10/28/2022 | Plaintiff's MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by ZURU INC. Responses due by 11/14/2022 附件： 1:Declaration of Sherin Xu in Support 2:Declaration of Joel B. Rothman in Support 3:(Text of Proposed Order) |
| 10/28/2022 | Plaintiff's MOTION to Seal Specific Documents per Local Rule 5.4 by ZURU INC. 附件： 1:(Text of Proposed Order) |
| 10/28/2022 | Plaintiff's MOTION for Order Authorizing Alternate Service of Process by ZURU INC. 附件： 1:Declaration of Joel B. Rothman in Support 2:Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Joel B. Rothman in Support 3:(Text of Proposed Order) |
| 10/28/2022 | PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING PRETRIAL DISCOVERY MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAUREN F. LOUIS. PURSUANT to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Magistrate Judge Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned Cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis to take all necessary and proper action as required by law with respect to any and all pretrial discovery matters. Any motion affecting deadlines set by the Court's Scheduling Order is excluded from this referral, unless specifically referred by separate Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis's discovery procedures. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 10/28/2022. |
| 10/28/2022 | PAPERLESS PRETRIAL ORDER. This order has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff's counsel is hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of a responsive pleading, a copy of this Order. It is further ORDERED that S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1 shall apply to this case and the parties shall hold a scheduling conference no later than twenty (20) days after the filing of the first responsive pleading by the last responding defendant, or within sixty (60) days after the filing of the complaint, whichever occurs first. However, if all defendants have not been served by the expiration of this deadline, Plaintiff shall move for an enlargement of time to hold the scheduling conference, not to exceed 90 days from the filing of the Complaint. Within ten (10) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint scheduling report. Failure of counsel to file a joint scheduling report within the deadlines set forth above may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs. The parties should note that the time period for filing a joint scheduling report is not tolled by the filing of any other pleading, such as an amended complaint or Rule 12 motion. The scheduling conference may be held via telephone. At the conference, the parties shall comply with the following agenda that the Court adopts from S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1: (1) Documents (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.1 and 2) - The parties shall determine the procedure for exchanging a copy of, or a description by category and location of, all documents and other evidence that is reasonably available and that a party expects to offer or may offer if the need arises. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B). (a) Documents include computations of the nature and extent of any category of damages claimed by the disclosing party unless the computations are privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C). (b) Documents include insurance agreements which may be at issue with the satisfaction of the judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(D). (2) List of Witnesses - The parties shall exchange the name, address and telephone number of each individual known to have knowledge of the facts supporting the material allegations of the pleading filed by the party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A). The parties have a continuing obligation to disclose this information. (3) Discussions and Deadlines (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.2) - The parties shall discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case. Failure to comply with this Order or to exchange the information listed above may result in sanctions and/or the exclusion of documents or witnesses at the time of trial. S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.I. The parties are hereby on notice that this Court requires all filings to be formatted in 12 point Times New Roman font and double spaced, including any footnotes, with one inch margins on all sides. Failure to follow these formatting guidelines may result in the filing being stricken, any opposing filing being granted by default, and the imposition of other sanctions, including attorney's fees and costs. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. The parties shall seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted). Pursuant to Administrative Order 2016-70 of the Southern District of Florida and consistent with the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit's Local Rules and Internal Operating Procedures, within three (3) days of the conclusion of a trial or other proceeding, parties must file via CM/ECF electronic versions of documentary exhibits admitted into evidence, including photographs of non-documentary physical exhibits. The Parties are directed to comply with each of the requirements set forth in Administrative Order 2016-70 unless directed otherwise by the Court. Telephonic appearances are not permitted for any purpose. Upon reaching a settlement in this matter the parties are instructed to notify the Court by telephone and to file a Notice of Settlement within twenty-four (24) hours. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 10/28/2022. |
| 10/27/2022 | FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK 附件： 1:Complaint |
| 10/27/2022 | Summons Issued as to The Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule " A ". |
| 10/27/2022 | Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge K. Michael Moore. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren F. Louis is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. |
| 10/27/2022 | COMPLAINT for Damages and Injunctive Relief against ZURU INC. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16056833, filed by ZURU INC. 附件： 1:Exhibit 1 - Trademark Registrations 2:Exhibit 2 - Prior Trademark Counterfeiting Actions 3:Civil Cover Sheet 4:Summon(s) |
