最近更新：2025-01-18
2024-cv-11517
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 01/16/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process, 13, is granted. The court finds that electronic service of process is proper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3). Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. To the extent that the motion requests service of process of any temporary restraining order in this case, service is not necessary because this court has already denied the motion for a TRO. 16. |
| 01/16/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal, 4, and for a temporary restraining order and for expedited discovery, 10, are denied. Plaintiff seeks leave to file under seal so that plaintiff may obtain a temporary restraining order freezing the defendants' assets before revealing the defendants' identities. See 4. "The Supreme Court has made clear that courts lack the power to issue an asset freeze at the beginning of a case, unless that party is seeking equitable monetary relief." Zorro Productions, Inc. v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, No. 23-cv-5761, 2023 WL 8807254, at *4 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 20, 2023) (citing Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. All. Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 (1999)); see also Shenzhen Yihong Lighting Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 23-cv-1560, at Dkt. 15 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 22, 2023). Indeed, "[a]s a general matter [ ] prejudgment asset restraints are not proper simply to establish a fund from which a later award of money damages can be satisfied." Id. (second alteration in original) (quoting Banister v. Firestone, No. 17-cv-8940, 2018 WL 4224444, at *9 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 5, 2018)). In Schedule A cases, plaintiffs often initially demand equitable relief in the form of an accounting of profits, but after obtaining a temporary asset freeze, plaintiffs uniformly shift their focus to demanding statutory damages. Id. at *3-4. In substance, then, if not in form, Schedule A plaintiffs seek prejudgment asset restraints to establish a fund from which money damages may be awarded. So, despite the demand in plaintiff's complaint that it be awarded defendants' profits, the court is not persuaded that plaintiff will actually seek or obtain such equitable relief-as opposed to statutory damages-in this case. See Zorro, 2023 WL 8807254, at *3-4. Thus, even if plaintiff's initial demand for an accounting of profits could provide this court with the power to issue a prejudgment asset freeze, see Grupo Mexicano, 527 U.S. at 333; Banister, 2018 WL 4224444, at *9, the court is not persuaded that such a freeze is warranted. Because the court denies the motion for a temporary restraining order, there is no reason to seal plaintiff's filings pending such relief. Plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal, 4, and for a temporary restraining order, 10, are therefore denied. Plaintiff's sealed exhibits, 3, 12, are stricken. If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, plaintiff must file its exhibits publicly on the docket by 1/31/2025. |
| 12/20/2024 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/20/2024: Mailed notice. |
| 11/12/2024 | MEMORANDUM by United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee Regarding Joinder |
| 11/12/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff United States Olympic and Paralympic CommitteeElectronic Service of Process 附件： 1:(Declaration Werber Decl.) |
| 11/12/2024 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee Ex. 1 to the Paragoso Declaration regarding memorandum in support of motion, 11 附件： 1:(Exhibit Paragoso Ex. 1 - 5 of 5) 2:Exhibit Paragoso Ex. 1 - 4 of 5 3:Exhibit Paragoso Ex. 1 - 3 of 5 4:Exhibit Paragoso Ex. 1 - 2 of 5 5:Exhibit Paragoso Ex. 1 - 1 of 5 |
| 11/12/2024 | MEMORANDUM by United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee in support of motion for temporary restraining order 10 and other relief 附件： 1:(Declaration Werber Declaration) 2:Declaration Paragoso Declaration |
| 11/12/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee for temporary restraining order |
| 11/12/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee by Peter Krusiewicz |
| 11/08/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee by Matthew A. Werber |
| 11/08/2024 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials. |
| 11/08/2024 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. |
| 11/08/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee |
| 11/08/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 11/08/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). |
| 11/07/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee to seal document exhibit 3 |
| 11/07/2024 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee Schedule A to the Complaint regarding complaint, 1 |
| 11/07/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 11/07/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22705492. 附件： 1:(Exhibit 4 - DHS) 2:Exhibit 3 - IP 3:Exhibit 1 - TM Certificates 4:Exhibit 2 - CBP |
