最近更新：2025-01-18
2024-cv-11632
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 01/16/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff's renewed motion [19] for leave to conduct expedited discovery is denied for two independent reasons. First, plaintiff contends that she is likely to succeed in showing that this court has personal jurisdiction over defendant because defendant offers to sell allegedly infringing goods via an Amazon.com store. See Mem. Supp. Renewed Mot. Leave to Conduct Expedited Discovery 45, Doc. No. [20] (hereinafter "Mem. Supp."). Plaintiff cites no evidence indicating that an Illinois resident has purchased, or has attempted to purchase, an allegedly infringing product from defendant. See id. Plaintiff identifies no other steps taken by defendant to avail itself of the benefits and protections of Illinois law. See id. As explained in the order dated 12/05/2024, denying plaintiff's first motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery, Doc. No. [18] at 2, plaintiff's showing does not suffice under Seventh Circuit law on personal jurisdiction because it would result in nearly universal personal jurisdiction over internet sellers. Plaintiff does not cite or attempt to distinguish the personal jurisdiction cases cited in the order dated 12/05/2024: Collectanea J. Ltd. v. Defendants on Schedule A, 2024 WL 4604532, at *4-6 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 29, 2024) and Unicolors, Inc. v. Shewin Flagship Shops, 2024 WL 4567268, at *5-9 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 24, 2024). Accordingly, plaintiff has not demonstrated that she is likely to succeed in showing that this court has personal jurisdiction over defendant. Second, plaintiff cites images of her intellectual property and images of the accused product and then argues in conclusory fashion that she is likely to succeed on her copyright infringement claims. See Mem. Supp. 56. The court has reviewed the images plaintiff cites, and it does not find the required copyright infringement analysis to be clear or straightforward, given that plaintiff claims copyright protection for unspecified aspects of an image of a natural object, i.e., a mushroom. See generally Kelley v. Chi. Park Dist., 635 F.3d 290, 302-04 (7th Cir. 2011); Wildlife Exp. Corp. v. Carol Wright Sales, Inc., 18 F.3d 502, 508-09 (7th Cir. 1994). If plaintiff wishes to convince the court that she is likely to succeed on her copyright infringement claims, she must meaningfully analyze the elements of her claims as they apply to the record in the case at bar. Mailed notice |
| 01/15/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: By request of one of plaintiff's attorneys, the deadline to file a joint initial status report is extended to and including 02/14/2025. Mailed notice |
| 12/20/2024 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/20/2024: Mailed notice. |
| 12/19/2024 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Gabrielle Brianna Delgado |
| 12/19/2024 | MEMORANDUM in Support of 19 Exparte Motion [RENEWED] 附件： 1:(Exhibit 2, to Affidavit of Keith A. Vogt) 2:Exhibit 1, to Affidavit of Keith A. Vogt 3:Exhibit 1 4:Affidavit Local Rule 5.5(d) Affidavit of Keith A. Vogt |
| 12/05/2024 | ORDER Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 12/5/2024.Mailed notice |
| 12/05/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Enter order denying without prejudice plaintiff's motion 13 for leave to conduct expedited discovery. In accordance with the order, plaintiff may renew her motion on or before 12/19/2024.Mailed notice |
| 11/13/2024 | ORDER: An initial status report is due on or before January 15, 2025. Counsel and parties are directed to familiarize themselves with the pretrial procedures in Judge Gottschall's case management packet, which is available from the court's website at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Please pay particular attention to the requirement to exchange initial disclosures within 14 days of the parties' initial discovery planning conference and the court's requirement that the parties are to explore settlement opportunities and identify areas of agreement prior to the filing of the first status report. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C) and 26(f)(2).If, by the due date of the scheduled status report, defendants have not been served, plaintiff should send an email to the chambers email account, chambers_gottschall@ilnd.uscourts.gov, to reset the status date. Counsel in cases removed from another court should follow these procedures to the extent applicable. See the order and Judge Gottschall's case management packet for further details. Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 11/13/2024.Mailed notice |
| 11/13/2024 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Gabrielle Brianna Delgado |
| 11/13/2024 | MEMORANDUM in support of 13 Exparte motion 附件： 1:Exhibit 1, of Keith A. Vogt's Affidavit 2:(Exhibit 2, of Keith A. Vogt's Affidavit) 3:Exhibit 1 4:Affidavit of Keith A. Vogt Pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(d) |
| 11/13/2024 | [Amended] Schedule A to the Complaint 1 and Schedule A 2 by Gabrielle Brianna Delgado |
| 11/13/2024 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 11/12/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 11/12/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel P McLaughlin. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). |
| 11/12/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gabrielle Brianna Delgado by Christopher Romero |
| 11/12/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gabrielle Brianna Delgado by Monica Rita Martin |
| 11/12/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gabrielle Brianna Delgado by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre |
| 11/12/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gabrielle Brianna Delgado by Adam Grodman |
| 11/12/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gabrielle Brianna Delgado by Yi Bu |
| 11/12/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gabrielle Brianna Delgado by Yanling Jiang |
| 11/12/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gabrielle Brianna Delgado by Keith A. Vogt |
| 11/12/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 11/12/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Gabrielle Brianna Delgado Schedule A to Complaint 1 |
| 11/12/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by Gabrielle Brianna Delgado; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22716211. 附件： 1:Exhibit 1 2:Exhibit 2 3:Exhibit 3 4:(Exhibit 4) |
