2024-cv-06099
日期 | 描述 |
---|---|
11/22/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Collectanea J. Limited (Amended) |
11/19/2024 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
11/18/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Pursuant to plaintiff's notice 26 of voluntary dismissal, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order 21 is denied without prejudice as moot. Civil case terminated. All presently sealed documents will remain sealed for six months, that is, until and including 05/15/2025. Plaintiff must show good cause under Local Rule 26.2(c) to continue the seal beyond that date. If plaintiff does not file a motion to extend the seal on or before 05/15/2025, all presently sealed documents will be unsealed on 05/16/2025. Motion for TRO 21 is denied; Civil case terminated. Mailed notice |
10/31/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: In its supplemental memorandum 24, plaintiff proposes that, in lieu of service of the motion for a temporary restraining order on the third party platform, the court set "a deadline for any third party platform to object prior to the implementation of any temporary restraining order." Suppl. Mem. 1. Plaintiff asserts that this procedure is consistent with Harai v. Defendants Listed on Schedule A, No. 1:23-cv-03382 (N.D. Ill. June 1, 2023). Id. But this court did not follow such a procedure in Harai. Rather, as the minute order (No. 1:23-cv-03382, Doc. No. 15) of 06/01/2023 states, the plaintiff voluntarily gave notice of her motion for a temporary restraining order to Amazon. The court then entered a minute order stating in part: "Amazon has until noon on Thursday, June 8, 2023, to object to plaintiff's request that the court find that it has personal jurisdiction over it and that it is in active concert or participation with the defendants named in schedule A to the complaint." Id. (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(d)(2)). The deadline came and went without Amazon filing a response, and the court entered a temporary restraining order on 06/09/2023. As the foregoing discussion shows, Harai does not support plaintiff's request, which the court reads as a proposal to adopt a temporary restraining order without notice. (No. 1:23-cv-03382, Doc. No. 18). Nor does the court understand what plaintiff means by proposing that third parties be given an opportunity to object before "implementation" of the temporary restraining order. If plaintiff wishes to explain what this proposal means, it may do so on or before 11/06/2024. Plaintiff's explanation should be accompanied by language it proposes to include in the temporary restraining order. Mailed notice |
10/17/2024 | MEMORANDUM set deadlines, 23 by Collectanea J. Limited OF LAW REGARDING THE ISSUE OF NOTICE TO THIRD PARTY PLATFORMS |
10/11/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff has filed an ex parte motion 21 for temporary restraining order. On or before 10/17/2024, plaintiff is directed to either give notice of the motion to the non-party providers of services to the defendants named in its proposed temporary restraining order (collectively "third-party providers") or file a supplemental memorandum of law explaining why notice to the third-party providers should not be required. For legal authority on notice to third parties named in a temporary restraining order, counsel are directed to the cases cited in this court's standing order in Lanham Act Counterfeiting Cases, which can be obtained from the judge's page on the court's official website at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. See Lake Shore Asset Mgmt. Limited v. CFTC, 511 F.3d 762 (7th Cir. 2007); United States v. Kirschenbaum, 156 F.3d 784 (7th Cir. 1998); Pow! Entertainment, LLC v. Defendants. Listed On Sched. A, 2020 WL 5076715 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 26, 2020). Mailed notice. |
10/10/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff's motion 20 under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) for leave to serve the summons and complaint by electronic means is denied without prejudice as premature. Plaintiff neither cites nor attempts to distinguish this court's holding in Luxottica Grp. S.p.A. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 391 F. Supp. 3d 816, 82128 (N.D. Ill. 2019), that a plaintiff must demonstrate reasonable diligence in determining an international defendant's mailing address before the court can find that the Hague Convention does not apply and authorize service by electronic means. See Luxottica, 391 F. Supp. 3d at 82224. Plaintiff may renew its motion after (1) third-party providers of services to defendants answer plaintiff's discovery requests and (2) plaintiff has conducted a reasonably diligent investigation of any mailing addresses disclosed. Mailed notice |
09/05/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Collectanea J. Limited for temporary restraining order 附件: 1:(Exhibit One: Declaration of L. Pittaway) |
09/05/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Collectanea J. Limited FOR ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF PROCESS PURSUANTTO FED. R. CIV. P. 4(f)(3) |
09/03/2024 | ORDER: An initial status report is due on or before October 4, 2024. Counsel and parties are directed to familiarize themselves with the pretrial procedures in Judge Gottschall's case management packet, which is available from the court's website at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Please pay particular attention to the requirement to exchange initial disclosures within 14 days of the parties' initial discovery planning conference and the court's requirement that the parties are to explore settlement opportunities and identify areas of agreement prior to the filing of the first status report. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C) and 26(f)(2).If, by the due date of the scheduled status report, defendants have not been served, plaintiff should send an email to the chambers email account, chambers_gottschall@ilnd.uscourts.gov, to reset the status date. Counsel in cases removed from another court should follow these procedures to the extent applicable. See the order and Judge Gottschall's case management packet for further details. Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 9/3/2024.Mailed notice |
08/29/2024 | STATUS Report by Collectanea J. Limited |
08/15/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff is instructed to file a status report on the progress of discovery by and including 8/29/2024.Mailed notice |
08/12/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff's motion 11 for a ten-day extension of its deadline to respond to the minute order 9 entered 7/25/2024 is granted. Plaintiff's deadline is extended to and including 8/12/2024. The court clarifies that it granted plaintiff's motion 7 for leave to conduct expedited discovery by sealed order 10 dated 7/25/2024. Mailed notice |
07/30/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Collectanea J. Limited EXHIBITS THREE (SCHEDULE A) AND FOUR (EVIDENCE) TO THE DECLARATION OF YU CHUNG TING (DOC. 12) 附件: 1:(Exhibit Three: Evidence) |
07/30/2024 | DECLARATION of Yu Chung Ting 附件: 1:(Exhibit One: Registration with Samples) |
07/30/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Collectanea J. Limited for extension of time TO RESPOND TO COURT ORDER [DOC. 9] |
07/25/2024 | SEALED ORDER Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 7/25/2024. Mailed notice |
07/25/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: This court's Local Rule 5.5(d) provides, "A motion for an ex parte order shall be accompanied by an affidavit showing cause for withholding service and stating whether or not a previous application for similar relief has been made." Within seven days (on or before 8/1/2024), plaintiff is instructed to file a Local Rule 5.5(d) affidavit regarding its motion 7 for expedited discovery. The affidavit must explain why the non-party providers of services to defendant, such as Walmart, named in plaintiff's proposed order, should not be given notice of the motion for expedited discovery and an opportunity to be heard on the motion. Mailed notice |
07/25/2024 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. |
07/24/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Collectanea J. Limited, a Hong Kong Limited Corporation for discovery from third parties |
07/19/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Collectanea J. Limited, a Hong Kong Limited Corporation by Michael Thomas Stanley |
07/19/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
07/19/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). |
07/19/2024 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Collectanea J. Limited, a Hong Kong Limited Corporation |
07/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Collectanea J. Limited, a Hong Kong Limited Corporation SCHEDULE A |
07/19/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Collectanea J. Limited, a Hong Kong Limited Corporation by Lydia Pittaway |
07/19/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
07/19/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by Collectanea J. Limited, a Hong Kong Limited Corporation; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22261485. 附件: 1:Exhibit One: Registration with Samples 2:Exhibit Two: CBP Report 3:Exhibit Three: Law Review Article 4:(Exhibit Four: HSI Report) |
案件最新进展,来源于美国联邦法院,下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件:部分原告会选择隐匿发案,或者对提交的文件进行密封处理,因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开(一般PI阶段左右才会公开)。
诉状:诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型,以及诉讼请求,如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等,这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新,未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮