最近更新：2025-02-18
2024-cv-11906
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 02/07/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: In light of plaintiff's response to the court's show-cause order, [62], and the court's conclusion that joinder of the defendants in this case is improper under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20, all defendants except Nos. 13 and 33 (CheungPrint and Annexfun) are dismissed without prejudice See UWM Student Ass'n v. Lovell, 888 F.3d 854, 863 (7th Cir. 2018) ("The remedy for misjoinder. is severance or dismissal without prejudice."). By 2/21/2025, plaintiff should file a status report regarding how it seeks to proceed with this case. |
| 02/05/2025 | RESPONSE by Plaintiff Zewei Chen to text entry, [62] |
| 02/03/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: In light of the notice of withdrawal of motion to dismiss, [77], defendant BAOMU TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED, LANZHI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED's motion to dismiss, [24], is withdrawn. The hearing set for 2/4/2025, [75], is stricken. |
| 02/03/2025 | ANSWER to amended complaint, COUNTERCLAIM filed by CheungPrint, Annexfun against Zewei Chen. by CheungPrint, Annexfun |
| 02/02/2025 | Notice of Withdrawal of Motion To Dismiss (ECF 24) by BAOMU TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED, LANZHI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED |
| 01/31/2025 | ORDER: The motion to substitute counsel for defendants Enjoyin, Baomu Technology Co., Limited, and Lanzhi Technology Limited, [72], is granted. Pete Wolfgram is substituted as counsel for these three defendants. Mr. Wolfgram intends to appear at the 2/4/25 hearing. Lance Liu's motion to withdraw as counsel for these three defendants, [73], is granted. Lance Liu is terminated as counsel for these three defendants and need not appear at the 2/4/25 hearing. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 1/31/2025: Mailed notice. |
| 12/20/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Motion Hearing set for 2/4/2025 at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2325. |
| 01/30/2025 | Legal Status of Enjoyin STATEMENT by Enjoyin 附件： 1:Exhibit Exhibit 1 |
| 01/30/2025 | MOTION by Attorney Lance Liu to withdraw as attorney for Enjoyin, BAOMU TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED, LANZHI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED. No party information provided Presented before District Judge |
| 01/29/2025 | MOTION by Defendants Enjoyin, BAOMU TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED, LANZHI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED to substitute attorney Presented before District Judge |
| 01/29/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: After the court denied attorney Liu's motion to withdraw as counsel for defendant Enjoyin and directed that "Plaintiff's counsel and Mr. Liu must appear in person at the 2/4/2025 1:00 p.m. hearing in Courtroom 2325 and be prepared to discuss these matters," [70], Mr. Liu emailed court staff today, 1/29/2025, requesting permission to appear by telephone for the 2/4/2025 hearing because the client (Enjoyin) is no longer paying for any fees or traveling expenses. However, in addition to appearing on behalf of Enjoyin on 12/17/2024, [33], Mr. Liu originally (on 12/10/2024) appeared on behalf of two other defendants (defendants Baomu Technology Co., Limited, and Lanzhi Technology Limited), [22], and filed on behalf of those defendants (defendants Baomu Technology Co., Limited, and Lanzhi Technology Limited) the pending motion to dismiss that is scheduled to be argued at the 2/4/2025 hearing, [24], as well as the reply in support of that motion, [56]. The court sometimes permits telephonic appearances as a courtesy, but here, the hearing is a substantive argument about the motion and briefs that Mr. Liu filed on behalf of Baomu Technology Co., Limited, and Lanzhi Technology Limited, and any attorney who intends to present substantive argument in connection with the motion must appear in person. 2. Yesterday, 1/28/2025, plaintiff's counsel emailed court staff inquiring whether the 2/4/2025 hearing could be canceled because plaintiff has withdrawn its motion for a preliminary injunction and the motion to dismiss could be ruled on based on the briefs, or alternatively requesting a telephone hearing. These requests are denied. The in-person hearing stands. 3. At the 2/4/2025 hearing, plaintiff should be prepared to address why this case should not be dismissed or severed for improper joinder. See [62]. 4. The motion by defendants Annexfun and CheungPrint to vacate the TRO, [21], is denied as moot because the TRO expired on 12/20/2024. |
| 01/29/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Lance Liu's motion to withdraw as attorney for Enjoyin [64] is denied without prejudice to renewal, subject to resolution of the issues identified in this order. On 1/7/2025, Fangpeng Chen filed a pro se appearance. On 1/22/2025, Fangpeng Chen filed, pro se, a response to the complaint on behalf of defendant Amazon store Enjoyin. On 1/24/2025, attorney Lance Liu filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for defendant Enjoyin, attaching an affidavit of Fangpeng Chen, the owner and manager of Enjoyin, and stating that Fangpeng Chen intends to proceed pro se going forward. [64], [64-1]. However, first, the motion does not comply with Local Rule 83.17, as it does not attach the court's form Notification of Party Contact Information. Second, none of the filings above make clear whether Enjoyin is an independent legal entity (such as a corporation, LLC, or other organization formally established under the relevant corporate laws of a country or state) or a d/b/a (i.e. a trade name through which Fangpeng Chen operates without a formally established business entity). If Enjoyin is an independent legal entity, Enjoyin cannot represent itself, nor can a nonlawyer represent Enjoyin, and Enjoyin would need to be represented by counsel in order to defend the case. Scandia Down Corp. v. Euroquilt, Inc., 772 F.2d 1423, 1427 (7th Cir. 1985). Mr. Liu and Fangpeng Chen are directed to file by 1/31/2025 a statement on the docket confirming or denying whether Enjoyin is an independent legal entity. Plaintiff's counsel and Mr. Liu must appear in person at the 2/4/2025 1:00 p.m. hearing in Courtroom 2325 and be prepared to discuss these matters. |
| 01/29/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Pursuant to plaintiff's notice of withdrawal, [67], the motion for preliminary injunction, [30], is hereby withdrawn. The oral argument on the motion to dismiss set for 2/4/2025, [41], stands. |
| 01/28/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling: The Court adopts the following dates proposed by the parties: initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1)(A) shall be made by all parties by 2/7/2025; fact discovery shall be completed by 12/7/2025 (this is a firm deadline). Additionally, the deadline to amend the pleadings and for joinder of any additional parties shall be 5/9/2025. The Court will not set an expert discovery schedule until it is clear the fact discovery deadline will be met. The parties are reminded to promptly bring any discovery motions before the Court, including motions to enforce subpoenas or motions for protective orders. The parties report they have and continue to engage in settlement discussions, but are not interested in a settlement conference at this time. The parties should keep in mind that Judge Holleb Hotaling's schedule typically is booked 2-3 months out from present with regards to settlement conferences, so the parties should notify Judge Holleb Hotaling's chambers as soon as possible once they realize they want a settlement conference; they do not need to wait for the next status report date. The parties are to file an updated joint status report on 3/31/2025. |
| 01/27/2025 | PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF PREVIOUSLY FILED MOTION by Zewei Chen withdrawal of Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Dkt. No. 30] |
| 01/26/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Zewei Chen by Wei Wang |
| 01/24/2025 | REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Zewei Chen |
| 01/24/2025 | MOTION by Attorney Lance Liu to withdraw as attorney for Enjoyin. New address information: Enjoyin, Fangpeng Chen, #12 Lunduzhenhupucunshilu, shantou, chenghai, guangdong, P.R. China 515825 Presented before Magistrate Judge 附件： 1:Affidavit |
| 01/22/2025 | RESPONSE by Plaintiff Fangpeng Chen. 附件： 1:Exhibit 6 2:Exhibit 2 3:Exhibit 5 4:Exhibit 1 |
| 01/22/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 2/5/2025, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed or severed for improper joinder. Plaintiff is advised of the following: First, "[o]n motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party." Fed. R. Civ. P. 21(a). Second, sua sponte review of the propriety of joinder in Schedule A cases is a regular practice of courts in this district because plaintiffs "routinely file these multi-defendant cases. using cookie-cutter complaints that allege in a conclusory manner that 'on information and belief' each infringing defendant is inter-connected with the others." Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 24-cv-1566, 2024 WL 2953105, at *1 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Third, "[c]ourts generally find that claims against different defendants arose out of the same transaction or occurrence only if there is a logical relationship between the separate causes of action." Estee Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). Fourth, courts have held that "to be part of the same transaction requires shared, overlapping facts that give rise to each cause of action, and not just distinct, albeit coincidentally identical, facts." Id. (quoting In re EMC Corp., 677 F.3d 1351, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2012)). Fifth, courts have held that the allegation that multiple defendants have infringed on the same copyright or trademark in the same way "does not create the substantial evidentiary overlap required to find a similar transaction or occurrence." Roadget Bus. Pte. Ltd. v. Schedule A Defs., No. 23-cv-17036, 2024 WL 1858592, at *6 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 29, 2024) (collecting cases). Finally, courts have held that the allegation that defendants "share unique identifiers, such as design elements and similarities of the unauthorized products offered for sale," is not sufficient to establish joinder. Ilustrata Servicos Design, Ltda. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 21-cv-05993, 2021 WL 5396690, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 18, 2021); Art Ask Agency v. Individuals, Corps., Ltd. Liab. Cos., P'ships, & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 21-cv-06197, 2021 WL 5493226, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 23, 2021). |
| 01/21/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal, [58], defendants YIXUN TRADING CO.,LIMITED and SGP-US are hereby dismissed and terminated. |
| 01/20/2025 | AMENDED complaint by Zewei Chen against All Defendants 附件： 1:Exhibit Defendant list |
| 01/20/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants BAOMU TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED, LANZHI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED by Pete Scott Wolfgram |
| 01/17/2025 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Zewei Chen |
| 01/14/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling: This matter has been referred to Judge Holleb Hotaling for discovery management and settlement. By 1/24/2025, the parties are to file their initial Rule 26(f) conference report which shall, inter alia, propose a fact discovery schedule (discovery is to proceed concurrently while any motions are pending, unless the Court orders otherwise), and include a statement on whether the parties are interested in a settlement conference mediated by the Court at this juncture. (The parties should keep in mind that Judge Holleb Hotaling's schedule typically is booked 2-3 months out from present with regards to settlement conferences, so the parties should notify Judge Holleb Hotaling's chambers as soon as possible once they realize they want a settlement conference; they do not need to wait for the next status report date. This date is still likely to be sooner than a ruling on a motion to dismiss may come.) |
| 01/13/2025 | REPLY by BAOMU TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED, LANZHI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED to response in opposition to motion, [48], MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants BAOMU TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED, LANZHI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED [24] 附件： 1:Exhibit Exhibit 1 |
| 01/13/2025 | Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery supervision and scheduling, to set a deadline to file any motions for leave to amend the pleadings, to set a dispositive motions schedule, and for settlement. |
| 01/13/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Pursuant to the notices of dismissal, [42], [44], [45], defendants Ameisa, Ystc, WanplayDirect, Shenzhen Redsealovers Electronics Limited, XYSUIYI, Weituo, Civan Direct, QCCX TOYS, FToys, and PROLL are hereby dismissed and terminated. By 1/21/2025, plaintiff is directed to file an amended complaint identifying the remaining defendants. |
| 01/10/2025 | STATUS Report Joint Status Report by Zewei Chen |
| 01/07/2025 | PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Fangpeng Chen. (Received via pro se email on 01/07/2025) |
| 01/06/2025 | REPLY by Zewei Chen to response in opposition to motion[37], MOTION by Defendants Annexfun, CheungPrint to vacate order on motion for extension of time, terminate hearings, [19], SEALED Order[13] [21] |
| 01/06/2025 | REPLY by Zewei Chen to response in opposition to motion[43] |
| 01/06/2025 | REPLY by Zewei Chen to response in opposition to motion[34] |
| 01/06/2025 | RESPONSE by Zewei Chenin Opposition to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants BAOMU TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED, LANZHI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED [24] 附件： 1:Declaration Decl. of Chen |
| 01/06/2025 | ANSWER to Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM filed by CheungPrint, Annexfun against Zewei Chen. by CheungPrint, Annexfun |
| 12/20/2024 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/20/2024: Mailed notice. |
| 12/27/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Zewei Chen |
| 12/26/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Zewei Chen of Certain Doe Defendants |
| 12/26/2024 | RESPONSE by Jiangxing, silymoly, NVDILO-US, Layseen-USin Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Zewei Chen for preliminary injunction [30] |
| 12/22/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Zewei Chen of Certain Doe Defendant |
| 12/20/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received the status report. [40]. The motion for a preliminary injunction, [30], is taken under advisement. Plaintiff's reply to defendants' responses to the preliminary injunction, [34], [37], is due by 1/6/2025. To the extent that plaintiff's motion, [30], seeks to extend the TRO until the court rules on the preliminary injunction, the motion is denied. See H-D Michigan, LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 844 (7th Cir. 2012) ("When a TRO is extended beyond the 28-day limit without the consent of the enjoined party, it becomes in effect a preliminary injunction."). Although the court sometimes extends a TRO beyond the 28-day limit while briefing on the preliminary injunction motion proceeds (and in that situation the TRO becomes effectively a preliminary injunction), here, the pending motions by certain defendants to vacate the temporary restraining order, [21], and to dismiss for failure to state a claim, [24]-both filed after the TRO was entered and extended-raise sufficient questions about the likelihood of success on the merits that the court declines to extend the TRO beyond the 28-day limit. (The motion by certain defendants to vacate the temporary restraining order, [21], will be moot when the TRO expires today, 12/20/2024. The motion by certain defendants to dismiss, [24], is being briefed and the court will consider the forthcoming briefs when they are filed.) Plaintiff requests that the court enter the preliminary injunction as to nonappearing defendants while the litigation proceeds as to the appearing defendants, but the court declines to do so as the arguments raised by appearing defendants in their filings, [21], [24], are not specific to those defendants. Briefing schedule previously set, [27], on certain defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, [24], stands: response is due on 1/6/2025; reply is due on 1/21/2025. In-person oral argument on the motion to dismiss [24] and the motion for preliminary injunction [30] is set for 2/4/2025 at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2325. Joint status report by all appearing parties is due by 1/10/2025. |
| 12/19/2024 | STATUS Report Reassignment Status Report by Zewei Chen |
| 12/18/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: Case Reassigned to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold pursuant to 28 USC 294(b).Mailed notice 附件： 1:(Request for Reassignment) |
| 12/18/2024 | ENTERED In Error Modified on 12/19/2024. |
| 12/18/2024 | RESPONSE by Annexfun, CheungPrintin Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Zewei Chen for preliminary injunction [30] |
| 12/18/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Zewei Chen of Certain Doe Defendant |
| 12/17/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction [30] is taken under advisement and the presentment hearing noticed for 12/19/2024 is stricken. Plaintiff shall submit a proposed preliminary injunction order and amended Schedule A to Proposed_Order_Kocoras@ilnd.uscourts.gov by noon on 12/19/2024. Mailed notice. (jn,) |
| 12/17/2024 | RESPONSE by Enjoyin, BAOMU TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED, LANZHI TECHNOLOGY LIMITEDin Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Zewei Chen for preliminary injunction [30] |
| 12/17/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Enjoyin by Lance Y. Liu |
| 12/17/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Zewei Chen of Certain Doe Defendants |
| 12/16/2024 | NOTICE of Motion by Ruoting Men for presentment of motion for preliminary injunction[30] before Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 12/19/2024 at 09:50 AM. |
| 12/16/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff Zewei Chen for preliminary injunction 附件： 1:Exhibit Defendant list 2:Exhibit Decl. of Men 3:Declaration Decl. of Chen |
| 12/14/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by ABC of Certain Doe Defendants |
| 12/13/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Jiangxing, silymoly, NVDILO-US, Layseen-US by Pete Scott Wolfgram |
| 12/12/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Defendant's motion for failure to state a claim [24] is entered and briefed as follows: response is due on 1/6/2025; reply is due on 1/21/2025. Court will rule by mail. Mailed notice. |
| 12/12/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by ABC of Certain Doe Defendant |
| 12/11/2024 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by ABC of Certain Doe Defendant |
| 12/11/2024 | MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants BAOMU TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED, LANZHI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED 附件： 1:Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Memorandum of Law 2:Appendix Memorandum of Law |
| 12/11/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Defendant's motion to vacate order on motion for extension of time [21] is entered and briefed as follows: response is due on 12/18/2024; reply is due on 12/26/2024. Court will rule by mail. Mailed notice. |
| 12/10/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants BAOMU TECHNOLOGY CO., LIMITED, LANZHI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED by Lance Y. Liu |
| 12/09/2024 | MOTION by Defendants Annexfun, CheungPrint to vacate order on motion for extension of time, terminate hearings, [19], SEALED Order[13] 附件： 1:Declaration of Chan Cheung 2:Declaration of Share Pok Man 3:Exhibit 1 |
| 12/09/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Annexfun, CheungPrint by Adam Edward Urbanczyk |
| 12/04/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Plaintiff's motion to extend the temporary restraining order 17 is granted. The temporary restraining order is extended to 12/20/2024. Presentment hearing scheduled on 12/5/2024 is stricken. Mailed notice. |
| 12/03/2024 | NOTICE of Motion by Ruoting Men for presentment of extension of time[17] before Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 12/5/2024 at 09:50 AM. |
| 12/03/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff ABC for extension of time MOTION TO EXTEND THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER |
| 11/27/2024 | BOND in the amount of $ 10,000, Cashier's Check, Receipt No. 100013613 posted by ABC |
| 11/26/2024 | REGISTRY Deposit Information Form by ABC (Received at the Intake Counter on 11/26/2024) |
| 11/26/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: In light of the Court's denial of Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed temporarily under a pseudonym, the Clerk is directed to update the docket to reflect Plaintiff's name as "Zewei Chen." Mailed notice. |
| 11/26/2024 | SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A, The |
| 11/22/2024 | SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 11/22/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 11/22/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras:Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process [7] and motion for entry of a temporary restraining order [11] are granted. Plaintiff's motion for entry of a temporary restraining order [8] is denied as moot. Mailed notice |
| 11/21/2024 | SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff ABC |
| 11/21/2024 | ORDER Signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 11/21/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 11/21/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Plaintiff's Motion to File Certain Documents Under Seal and to Proceed Under a Pseudonym Temporarily [4] is granted with respect to filing the identified documents under seal and denied with respect to proceeding under a pseudonym temporarily. Enter Order. Mailed notice. |
| 11/19/2024 | SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff ABC |
| 11/19/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff ABC for Electronic Service of Process 附件： 1:Declaration 2:Exhibit |
| 11/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff ABC 附件： 1:Exhibit 2:Exhibit 3:Exhibit 4:Exhibit 5:(Exhibit) |
| 11/19/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 11/19/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). |
| 11/19/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff ABC Notice of Claim - Trademark |
| 11/19/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiff ABC for leave to file 附件： 1:Exhibit |
| 11/19/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff ABC by Ruoting Men |
| 11/19/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 11/19/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by ABC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22746745. 附件： 1:Exhibit 2:Exhibit 3:Exhibit 4:Exhibit 5:Exhibit |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
