最近更新：2025-03-08
2025-cv-00181
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 02/13/2025 | NEW PARTIES: LIYJTK-7-14 day delivery! added to case caption. |
| 02/12/2025 | PRELIMINARY Injunction Order. Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 2/12/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 02/12/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Motion hearing held on Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction [35] on 2/12/2025. Defendant failed to appear and failed to otherwise object in response to the TRO or Plaintiff's motion. Accordingly, and based upon the same findings made in this Court's TRO [26], this Court finds that a preliminary injunction is appropriate and warranted, as well as unopposed and grants Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction [35]. Enter Preliminary Injunction Order. The Court directs the Clerk to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Plaintiff's counsel shall add Defendant to the Court's docket within three business days. Plaintiff may find instructions at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_cmecf/pdfs/v60/Add_Terminate_Instructions.pdf. Plaintiff shall file a status report by 3/31/25 proposing next steps to advance the case. Mailed notice. |
| 02/07/2025 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dyson Technology Limited as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 2/7/2025, answer due 2/28/2025. 附件： 1:(Exhibit A) 2:Declaration of Andrew D. Burnham |
| 02/07/2025 | NOTICE of Motion by Justin Tyler Joseph for presentment of motion for preliminary injunction 35 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 2/12/2025 at 11:00 AM. 附件： 1:(Exhibit A) |
| 02/07/2025 | DECLARATION of Justin T. Joseph regarding memorandum in support of motion 36 |
| 02/07/2025 | MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for preliminary injunction 35 |
| 02/07/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for preliminary injunction 附件： 1:(Exhibit A) |
| 01/24/2025 | SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000 posted by Dyson Technology Limited. (Document not imaged) |
| 02/05/2025 | SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 01/27/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court grants Plaintiff's ex parte motion 29 to extend the temporary restraining order entered 1/21/25 26. The Court finds that good cause exists to extend the temporary restraining order, and the order is hereby extended an additional fourteen days, to 2/18/25. The 1/29/25 Notice of Motion date is stricken. Mailed notice. |
| 01/24/2025 | NOTICE of Motion by Justin Tyler Joseph for presentment of extension of time[29] before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 1/29/2025 at 11:00 AM. |
| 01/24/2025 | DECLARATION of Justin T. Joseph regarding memorandum in support of motion[30] |
| 01/24/2025 | MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of extension of time[29] |
| 01/24/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for extension of time of Temporary Restraining Order |
| 01/22/2025 | MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 01/21/2025 | Registry Deposit Information Form by Dyson Technology Limited |
| 01/21/2025 | SEALED Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by the Honorable John Robert Blakey on 1/21/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 01/21/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff may proceed on its amended complaint, which claims trademark infringement by a single defendant. See [13], [14]. Based upon the materials submitted, this Court grants Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process [21], grants Plaintiff's ex parte motion for entry of a temporary restraining order [16], and strikes the 1/22/25 Notice of Motion date. Enter sealed temporary restraining order. Absent further order, this TRO will expire on 2/4/25. Mailed notice. |
| 01/15/2025 | NOTICE of Motion by Justin R. Gaudio for presentment of motion for temporary restraining order[16], motion for miscellaneous relief[21] before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 1/22/2025 at 11:00 AM. |
| 01/15/2025 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[22] |
| 01/15/2025 | MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[21] |
| 01/15/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) |
| 01/15/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 2 - Part 1 regarding declaration[19] |
| 01/15/2025 | DECLARATION of Giles Samuel Lane regarding memorandum in support of motion[17] 附件： 1:Exhibit 1 |
| 01/15/2025 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[17] |
| 01/15/2025 | MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for temporary restraining order[16] |
| 01/15/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery |
| 01/14/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 1 - Part 1 regarding amended complaint[13] |
| 01/14/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Amended Schedule A regarding amended complaint[13] |
| 01/14/2025 | AMENDED complaint by Dyson Technology Limited against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A 附件： 1:Exhibit 2 |
| 01/13/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to seal [4] but dismisses the complaint [1] without prejudice based upon improper joinder. Plaintiff has sued 62 online marketplaces alleging patent infringement, see [1], [2]. Joinder of multiple defendants in a single suit appears to run afoul of 35 U.S.C. § 299, which provides that "parties that are accused infringers may be joined in one action as defendants. only if-- (1) any right to relief is asserted against the parties jointly, severally, or in the alternative with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences relating to the making, using, importing into the United States, offering for sale, or selling of the same accused product or process; and (2) questions of fact common to all defendants or counterclaim defendants will arise in the action." Id. § 299(a). The statute specifically provides that "accused infringers may not be joined in one action as defendants. based solely on allegations that they each have infringed the patent or patents in suit." Id. § 299(b). Plaintiff's complaint, which lumps all Defendants together, alleges that "E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases share unique identifiers establishing a logical relationship between them, suggesting that Defendants' operation arises out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences." [1] 3. Along the same lines, Plaintiff alleges that "the e-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases often share unique identifiers, such as templates with common design elements that intentionally omit any contact information or other information for identifying Defendants or other Seller Aliases they operate or use. E-commerce stores operating under the Seller Aliases include other notable common features, such as use of the same registration patterns, accepted payment methods, check-out methods, keywords, advertising tactics, similarities in price and quantities, the same incorrect grammar and misspellings, and/or the use of the same text and images. Additionally, Infringing Products for sale by the Seller Aliases bear similar irregularities and indicia of being unauthorized to one another, suggesting that the Infringing Products were manufactured by and come from a common source and that Defendants are interrelated." Id. 18. But the screenshot evidence attached to the complaint [3-1] belies Plaintiff's conclusory allegations. Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate the propriety of joining all 62 defendants in this single action and dismisses the complaint [1] without prejudice. If Plaintiff can, consistent with its obligations under Rule 11, amend its complaint to allege facts to support joinder, it may do so by 2/10/25. Mailed notice. |
| 01/08/2025 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 01/08/2025 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). |
| 01/07/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Andrew Daniel Burnham |
| 01/07/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Justin Tyler Joseph |
| 01/07/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Lawrence J. Crain |
| 01/07/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Justin R. Gaudio |
| 01/07/2025 | Notice of Claims involving Patents by Dyson Technology Limited |
| 01/07/2025 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Dyson Technology Limited |
| 01/07/2025 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 01/07/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for leave to file under seal |
| 01/07/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 1 - Parts 1-2 regarding complaint[1] |
| 01/07/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Schedule A regarding complaint[1] |
| 01/07/2025 | COMPLAINT filed by Dyson Technology Limited; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22922466. 附件： 1:Exhibit 2 |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
