最近更新：2025-03-09
2025-cv-00630
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 02/10/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: Pursuant to the Notice of Dismissal [29], this case is dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 02/07/2025 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Dyson Technology Limited as to Defendant huayueecomme |
| 02/03/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: In light of the order entered on 1/30/2025 [27], the Clerk is directed to unseal docket entries [2],[3],[14],[15] and [21]. Mailed notice. |
| 01/30/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: Motion hearing held. The plaintiff's ex parte motion for temporary restraining order 17 is denied. The plaintiff contends that it "has submitted extensive documentation that Defendants make, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import into the United States for subsequent sale or use the same product, namely, that infringes directly and/or directly the Dyson Designs. The documentation submitted by Plaintiff show that an ordinary observer would be deceived into thinking that the Infringing Product was the same as the Dyson Designs." That "extensive documentation" consists of the asserted patent and a screen shot of the accused product. At no point does the plaintiff provide any analysis to explain why an ordinary observer would find the accused product to be substantially the same as the patented design. Nor is there any attempt to highlight the similarities between the two. Perhaps because there are few, if any, non-functional claimed features of the design contained in the accused product. The patent shows a cylindrically-shaped hair styling and hair care apparatus where the base of the primary cylinder includes a patterned or knurled band that extends perhaps a sixth of the way down the cylinder; three buttons arranged in a triangular pattern near the opposite end of the cylinder; a sharp line delineating the last sixth of the primary cylinder; and a narrower cylinder extending from the primary cylinder. (To be clear, this is a description of the figures shown in the patent and not a construction of the claims.) The accused product is also a cylindrically-shaped design with a knurled edge, but the knurling patterns appear distinct. Importantly, there are two buttons on the primary cylinder of the accused product arranged longitudinally (one on top of the other). The different knurled patterns and different arrangement of buttons preclude a finding that the accused product's design is substantially the same as the asserted patent. See PS Prods. Inc. v. Panther Trading Co. Inc., 122 F.4th 893, 898, 99 (Fed. Cir. 2024) ("To establish design patent infringement, a plaintiff must show an 'ordinary observer' would be deceived into believing the accused product is the same as the patented design."). In other words, the plaintiff has not shown that it is likely to show that an ordinary observer would believe the accused product is the same as the patented design. Because the Court denied the motion for a temporary restraining order, the Court sees no reason to maintain this case under seal. Therefore, the motion to seal 4 is denied. The same is true for the plaintiff's request for expedited discovery, which is also denied. The plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process 22 is granted. Mailed notice. |
| 01/29/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Jennifer Van Nacht |
| 01/24/2025 | NOTICE of Motion by Justin R. Gaudio for presentment of motion for leave to file 4, motion for miscellaneous relief 22, motion for temporary restraining order 17 before Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel on 1/30/2025 at 09:30 AM. |
| 01/24/2025 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 23 |
| 01/24/2025 | MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 22 |
| 01/24/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) |
| 01/24/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 2 - Part 1 regarding declaration 20 附件： 1:(Exhibit 2-1) |
| 01/24/2025 | DECLARATION of Giles Samuel Lane regarding memorandum in support of motion 18 附件： 1:(Exhibit 1) |
| 01/24/2025 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 18 |
| 01/24/2025 | MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for temporary restraining order 17 |
| 01/24/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery |
| 01/23/2025 | MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 01/23/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 1 - Part 1 regarding amended complaint[13] |
| 01/23/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Amended Schedule A regarding amended complaint[13] |
| 01/23/2025 | AMENDED complaint by Dyson Technology Limited against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A 附件： 1:Exhibit 2 |
| 01/22/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: The plaintiff has filed a complaint alleging infringement by 163 defendants. (R. 1 and R. 2.) This case follows a pattern common to "Schedule A" cases where plaintiffs allege that defendants employ similar methods and "work in active concert" to infringe plaintiffs' intellectual property. But experience has shown that not all defendants named in a Schedule A case work together. More importantly, experience has shown that joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 is rarely appropriate in Schedule A cases. Accordingly, the Court raises the propriety of joinder and requires the plaintiff to file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder on or before February 5, 2025. Alternatively, by the same date, the plaintiff may file an amended complaint naming one or more defendants; however, if the plaintiff names multiple defendants, the plaintiff must show that joinder of those defendants is proper. All pending motions are hereby stayed pending resolution of the joinder issue. Mailed notice. |
| 01/21/2025 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 01/21/2025 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). |
| 01/17/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Andrew Daniel Burnham |
| 01/17/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Justin Tyler Joseph |
| 01/17/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Lawrence J. Crain |
| 01/17/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Justin R. Gaudio |
| 01/17/2025 | Notice of Claims involving Patents by Dyson Technology Limited |
| 01/17/2025 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Dyson Technology Limited |
| 01/17/2025 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 01/17/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for leave to file under seal |
| 01/17/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 1 regarding complaint 1 |
| 01/17/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Schedule A regarding complaint 1 |
| 01/17/2025 | COMPLAINT filed by Dyson Technology Limited; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22971548. 附件： 1:(Exhibit 2) |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
