最近更新：2025-03-09
2025-cv-00495
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 02/19/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court previously dismissed Plaintiff's complaint for improper joinder, see [10]. At that time, the Court also observed that Plaintiff failed to allege facts to support the existence of personal jurisdiction as to each of the named Defendants, but granted Plaintiff leave to amend if it could cure the noted deficiencies; the Court indicated that, if Plaintiff failed to amend by 2/12/25, the Court would dismiss the case, id. To date, Plaintiff has failed to amend. Accordingly, consistent with its prior order [10], the Court hereby dismisses this case. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 01/28/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff seeks to sue 39 separate defendants in this single suit alleging trademark and copyright infringement, see [1], [2]. Joinder of multiple defendants in a single infringement action remains appropriate only if the claims against the defendants are asserted "with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences," and a common question of law or fact exists as to all defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2)(A)-(B). The complaint is largely silent as to joinder; Plaintiff alleges only that "upon information and belief, Defendants are an interrelated group of counterfeiters working in active concert to knowingly and willfully manufacture, import, distribute, offer for sale, and sell Counterfeit Products." See [1] 4. The allegation remains conclusory and insufficient to support joinder. As a result, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint [1] without prejudice. The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to seal [7]. To the extent Plaintiff can, consistent with its obligations under Rule 11, amend its complaint to allege facts to support the joinder of 39 defendants in this single action, it may do so by 2/12/25. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Court will dismiss this case. If Plaintiff elects to amend its complaint, it should also bolster its allegations relating to personal jurisdiction as to each Defendant. See, e.g., Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass'n, Inc. v. The Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 93435 (N.D. Ill. 2016) (simply alleging the existence of purported counterfeiting via an interactive website is not enough, by itself, to confer personal jurisdiction); Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc., 751 F.3d 796, 803 (7th Cir. 2014) ("Having an interactive website. should not open a defendant up to personal jurisdiction in every spot on the planet where that interactive website is accessible."); Rubik's Brand, Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 20-CV-5338, 2021 WL 825668, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2021) (screenshot evidence showing that an order could be placed by an Illinoisan, "amounts to nothing more than maintaining an interactive website that is accessible in Illinois," and "that alone cannot confer personal jurisdiction."). Mailed notice. |
| 01/27/2025 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials. |
| 01/27/2025 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. |
| 01/27/2025 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). |
| 01/27/2025 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 01/24/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiff Osprey LLC to seal document sealed document[2] |
| 01/24/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Osprey LLC by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr |
| 01/24/2025 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Osprey LLC |
| 01/24/2025 | USPTO Cover Sheet by Osprey LLC |
| 01/24/2025 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 01/24/2025 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Osprey LLC Schedule A to Complaint |
| 01/24/2025 | COMPLAINT filed by Osprey LLC; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22999027. 附件： 1:Exhibit Exhibit 2 2:Exhibit Exhibit 1 |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
