最近更新：2025-03-09
2025-cv-01746
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 03/04/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Minute entry [20] is amended as follows. The Court requires that any motion for a temporary restraining order and/or asset freeze is accompanied by a declaration from an attorney of record that provides the following information. First, to demonstrate the immediate harm necessary to grant the drastic remedy of an ex parte temporary restraining order, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant has sold or offered to sell the allegedly infringing product(s) within the last two months and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Generally, evidence that a defendant has sold or offered to sell the infringing products within the last two months may include: (1) screenshots of the listings collected within the last two months; (2) screenshots older than two months with an attestation that the listings reflected in the screenshots have been checked within the last two months and were active; or (3) evidence of a purchase by a customer in Illinois within the last two months. Second, as relevant to personal jurisdiction, without which any temporary restraining order or asset freeze would be invalid, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant sold at least one allegedly infringing product to a customer in Illinois and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Here, "sold" means that the defendant accepted an order and payment for an allegedly infringing product to be shipped to Illinois. Third, to assure that Court that the rights of defendants who have not yet been served are being appropriately protected, the declaration must identify the case number(s) and assigned judge(s) for any pending case(s) brought by the plaintiff(s) against any of the named defendants, noting whether the intellectual property at issue was the same or different than in this case. If it is the same, the declaration should describe the disposition of the other case. The Court will address any motion for a temporary restraining order only after receipt of the described declaration, which can be filed contemporaneously with the motion. Mailed notice. |
| 02/25/2025 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding text entry, 20 |
| 02/21/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The Court requires that any motion for a temporary restraining order and/or asset freeze is accompanied by a declaration from an attorney of record that provides the following information. First, to demonstrate the immediate harm necessary to grant the drastic remedy of an ex parte temporary restraining order, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant has sold or offered to sell the allegedly infringing product(s) within the last two months and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Generally, evidence that a defendant has sold or offered to sell the infringing products within the last two months may include: (1) screenshots of the listings collected within the last two months; (2) screenshots older than two months with an attestation that the listings reflected in the screenshots have been checked within the last two months and were active; or (3) evidence of a purchase by a customer in Illinois within the last two months. Second, as relevant to personal jurisdiction, without which any temporary restraining order or asset freeze would be invalid, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant sold and shipped at least one allegedly infringing product to a customer in Illinois and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Third, to assure that Court that the rights of defendants who have not yet been served are being appropriately protected, the declaration must identify the case number(s) and assigned judge(s) for any pending case(s) brought by the plaintiff(s) against any of the named defendants, noting whether the intellectual property at issue was the same or different than in this case. If it is the same, the declaration should describe the disposition of the other case. The Court will address any motion for a temporary restraining order only after receipt of the described declaration, which can be filed contemporaneously with the motion. Mailed notice. |
| 02/21/2025 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[18] |
| 02/21/2025 | MEMORANDUM by Costa Del Mar, Inc., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[17] |
| 02/21/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Costa Del Mar, Inc., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) |
| 02/21/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Costa Del Mar, Inc., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. Exhibit 3 regarding declaration[15] |
| 02/21/2025 | DECLARATION of Jason Groppe regarding memorandum in support of motion[13] 附件： 1:Exhibit 2 2:Exhibit 1 |
| 02/21/2025 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[13] |
| 02/21/2025 | MEMORANDUM by Costa Del Mar, Inc., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order[12] |
| 02/21/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Costa Del Mar, Inc., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery |
| 02/20/2025 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion for leave to file under seal [3] is granted. Mailed notice. |
| 02/20/2025 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 02/20/2025 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). |
| 02/20/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Costa Del Mar, Inc., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. by Thomas Joseph Juettner |
| 02/20/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Costa Del Mar, Inc., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. by Berel Yonathan Lakovitsky |
| 02/20/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Costa Del Mar, Inc., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. by Amy Crout Ziegler |
| 02/20/2025 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Costa Del Mar, Inc., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. by Justin R. Gaudio |
| 02/20/2025 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Costa Del Mar, Inc., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. |
| 02/20/2025 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Costa Del Mar, Inc., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. |
| 02/20/2025 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 02/20/2025 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Costa Del Mar, Inc., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. for leave to file under seal |
| 02/20/2025 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Costa Del Mar, Inc., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley, Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint[1] |
| 02/20/2025 | COMPLAINT filed by Luxottica Group S.p.A., Costa Del Mar, Inc., Oakley, Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23106685. 附件： 1:Exhibit 1 |
案件最新进展，来源于美国联邦法院，下载文件请联系 18523047090 微信同号
被告名单文件：部分原告会选择隐匿发案，或者对提交的文件进行密封处理，因此包括被告信息在内的相关文件不会在前期公开（一般PI阶段左右才会公开）。
诉状：诉状通常包括原被告的基本信息、侵权行为、侵权类型，以及诉讼请求，如确认侵权、下架侵权产品、请求赔偿等，这个文件起诉就可以下载
案件每天自动更新，未及时更新的可点击 案件名称旁边 更新 按钮
