最近更新：2025-01-18
2024-cv-11325
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 12/20/2024 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/20/2024: Mailed notice. |
| 12/13/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:The plaintiff's motion for a TRO 14 is denied without prejudice. In support of the complaint, the plaintiff has provided screenshot evidence of the defendants' allegedly infringing products for sale online 6 7 and a claim chart analyzing the infringement of an "exemplary infringing product" from one of the defendants [5-3]. The Court cannot determine from these that each accused product contains all of the attributes required to infringe on the asserted patent. This is not like a trademark or copyright online counterfeiting suit, where a defendant's online infringement can be readily ascertained by examining the screenshot of a webpage. The Court would never grant preliminary injunctive relief in a single-defendant patent case without a rigorous comparison between the accused product(s) and the asserted claim(s), so it should go without saying that the Court will not do so against more than 100 defendants. The plaintiff must conduct (and file) a product-by-product analysis that (1) identifies each claim of the asserted patent that is allegedly infringed by each product of each defendant, and (2) demonstrates how each accused product incorporates every limitation of the claim(s) it allegedly infringes. If multiple parties are selling exactly identical products, the product-by-product analysis must so clarify. Additionally, the plaintiff must submit a supplemental document explaining why it is entitled to an asset restraint in this suit. CSC Holdings, Inc. v. Redisi, 309 F.3d 988, 996 (7th Cir. 2002) ("[A] district court may not issue an injunction freezing assets in an action for money damages where no equitable interest is claimed."); ABC Prods. v. Schedule A, No. 23-cv-04131, 2024 WL 1549784, at *6 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 9, 2024) (suit for patent infringement "does not provide for the equitable relief of accounting and profits"); see Univ. of Colo. Found., Inc. v. Am. Cyanamid Co., 342 F.3d 1298, 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (unjust-enrichment claims preempted when sufficiently "patent-like"). Mailed notice |
| 12/11/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Bishal Bhandari, GoBout LLC for Court-Ordered Service |
| 12/11/2024 | MEMORANDUM by Bishal Bhandari, GoBout LLC in support of motion for temporary restraining order 14 附件： 1:(Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Nicholas S. Lee) 2:Declaration of Nicholas S. Lee 3:Exhibit A |
| 12/11/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Bishal Bhandari, GoBout LLC for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery |
| 11/04/2024 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:Plaintiff's motion for leave to file document under seal 4 is granted. As such, plaintiff's unredacted complaint 5, Exhibit 2A 6, and Exhibit 2B 7, provisionally under seal pending order, are permitted to remain under seal. Mailed notice |
| 11/01/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 11/01/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). |
| 11/01/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Bishal Bhandari, GoBout LLC by Nicholas S. Lee |
| 11/01/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Bishal Bhandari, GoBout LLC by Sameeul Haque |
| 11/01/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Bishal Bhandari, GoBout LLC by Benjamin Adam Campbell |
| 11/01/2024 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Bishal Bhandari, GoBout LLC by Edward L. Bishop |
| 11/01/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Bishal Bhandari, GoBout LLC Exhibit 2B |
| 11/01/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Bishal Bhandari, GoBout LLC Exhibit 2A |
| 11/01/2024 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Bishal Bhandari, GoBout LLC Unredacted Complaint 附件： 1:(Notice of Claims) 2:Exhibit 6 3:Exhibit 1 4:Schedule A |
| 11/01/2024 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Bishal Bhandari, GoBout LLC for Leave to File Certain Documents Under Seal |
| 11/01/2024 | Notice of Claims Involving Patents or Trademarks by Bishal Bhandari, GoBout LLC |
| 11/01/2024 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 11/01/2024 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 11/01/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). |
| 11/01/2024 | COMPLAINT filed by Bishal Bhandari, GoBout LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22682838. 附件： 1:Exhibit 5 2:Exhibit 4 3:Exhibit 3 4:Exhibit 1 (Redacted) 5:Exhibit 2 (Redacted) 6:Schedule A (Redacted) 7:(Exhibit 6 (Redacted)) |
